The Comparison of the Dietary Intake Loss Between Elderly and Non-Elderly Patients After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Background/Aim The present study quantified the changes in the dietary and nutritional intake after gastrectomy between elderly and non-elderly patients. Patients and Methods This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Results Twenty-three patients ≥ 75 years old were classified into the elderly group, and 127 patients < 75 years old were classified into the non-elderly group. The respective median % dietary intake losses at 1 and 3 months postoperatively were −12.4% and −5.3% in the elderly group and −8.3% and −2.8% in the non-elderly group (p = 0.075 and 0.080). On comparing the intake loss of three major nutrients, the respective median % lipid intake losses at 1 and 3 months postoperatively were −13.5% and −5.8% in the elderly group and −7.3% and 0% in the non-elderly group (p = 0.029 and 0.045). Conclusion Our results suggested that elderly patients experienced more serious lipid intake loss after gastrectomy than non-elderly patients.

RhoA, Claudin 18, and c-MET in Gastric Cancer: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Significance in Curative Resected Patients

Background: Recently, markers related to molecular classification were suggested as promising therapeutic targets for treatment and prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer (GC), including c-MET, RhoA, and Claudin-18 (CLDN18). This study aimed to investigate their expression in GC and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and survival. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated GC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. c-MET, RhoA, and CLDN18 were analyzed through immunohistochemistry (IHC), and groups for analysis were determined according to the median values obtained for each marker. Results: Among the 349 GC evaluated, 180 (51.6%), 59 (16.9%), and 61 (17.5%) patients were completely negative for c-MET, RhoA, and CLDN18, respectively. Total gastrectomy, D1 lymphadenectomy, poorly differentiated histology, and greater inflammatory infiltrate were more frequent in the c-MET-negative group. Diffuse type, greater inflammatory infiltrate, and advanced pT and pTNM stage were associated with low-RhoA GC. The venous invasion was more frequent in the low-CLDN18 group. Furthermore, c-MET was positively correlated with RhoA and negatively with CLDN18. HER2 expression was associated with c-MET-positive and high-CLDN18 GC; and loss of E-cadherin expression in c-MET-negative and low-RhoA GC. c-MET-negative and Low-RhoA were significantly associated with worse disease-free survival. Conclusions: c-MET, RhoA, and CLD18 expression occurred frequently in GC. RhoA GC had distinct clinicopathological characteristics related to prognosis. c-MET and RhoA were associated with survival but were not independent predictors of prognosis.

The Comparison of the Dietary Intake Loss Between Elderly and Non-elderly Patients after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Background/Aim: The present study quantified the changes in the dietary and nutritional intake after gastrectomy between elderly and non-elderly patients. Patients and Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Results: 23 patients ≥75 years old were classified into the elderly group, and127 patients <75 years old were classified into the non-elderly group. The respective median % dietary intake losses at one and three months postoperatively were -12.4% and -5.3% in the elderly group and -8.3% and -2.8% in the non-elderly group (p=0.075 and 0.080). On comparing the intake loss of three major nutrients, the respective median % lipid intake losses at 1 and 3 months postoperatively were -13.5% and -5.8% in the elderly group and -7.3% and 0% in the non-elderly group (p=0.029 and 0.045). Conclusion: Our results suggested that elderly patients experienced more serious lipid intake loss after gastrectomy than non-elderly patients.

Impact of Type of Postoperative Complications on Long-Term Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients: Results From a High-Volume Institution in China

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative complication and its etiology on long-term survival for gastric cancer (GC) patients with curative resection.MethodsFrom January 2009 to December 2014, a total of 1,667 GC patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy were analyzed. Patients with severe complications (SCs) (Clavien–Dindo grade III or higher complications or those causing a hospital stay of 15 days or longer) were separated into a “complication group.” Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to reveal the relationship between postoperative complications and long-term survival. A 2:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline parameters between the two groups.ResultsSCs were diagnosed in 168 (10.08%) patients, including different etiology: infectious complications (ICs) in 111 (6.66%) and non-infectious complications (NICs) in 71 (4.26%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed that presence of SCs (P=0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, and further analysis by complication type demonstrated that the deteriorated overall survival was mainly caused by ICs (P=0.004) rather than NICs (P=0.068). After PSM, patients with SCs (p=0.002) still had a significantly decreased overall survival, and the presence of ICs (P=0.002) rather than NICs (P=0.067) showed a negative impact on long-term survival.ConclusionSerious complications, particularly of an infectious type, may have a negative impact on overall survival of GC patients. However, additional multicenter prospective studies with larger sample size are required to verify this issue.

Phase II feasibility study of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 followed by S-1 for stage III gastric cancer

Background This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) following S-1 therapy in patients with stage III gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. Methods Patients with stage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy were enrolled. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated within 8 weeks of gastrectomy. The first cycle of chemotherapy consisted of S-1 monotherapy (day 1–14), followed by a 7-day rest period. Cycles 2 and 3 consisted of the following: S-1 (day 1–14) administration, followed by a 14-day rest period, and an intravenous infusion of cisplatin and docetaxel on days 1 and 15. After two cycles, S-1 was administered for up to 1 year. Results Thirty patients were enrolled between 2014 and 2017. Febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher was the most common hematological toxicity with 4 patients (13.3%). Other hematological toxicities of grade 3 or higher were as follows: neutropenia in 3 (10.0%), leukopenia in 3 (10.0%), and anemia in 2 (6.7%) patients. Most frequent non-hematological toxicity of grade 3 was anorexia (n = 4, 13.3%) and general fatigue (n = 3, 10.0%); no grade 4 non-hematological toxicities were observed. Twenty-five patients (83.3%) completed two cycles of DCS treatment and 18 (60.0%) completed subsequent S-1 treatment for 1 year. The relative dose intensity of docetaxel and cisplatin was 0.86 and that of S-1 was 0.88. Conclusion The DCS regimen can be acceptable as an adjuvant chemotherapy and offers an effective postoperative treatment option for stage III gastric cancer patients. Trial registration number UMIN000012785. Date of registry 08/01/2014.

Does Extended Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage Really Bring Benefit on Patients With Gastric Cancer? A Meta-Analysis of Published Clinical Trials

PurposeThe purpose of the current meta-analysis is to analyze whether extended intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) can bring benefit on short-term outcomes or survival for patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to May 3, 2021, to find eligible studies. Postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and peritoneal recurrence–free survival (PRFS) were compared between EIPL group and No EIPL group.ResultsA total of five randomized controlled trials with 1,790 patients were included in the current meta-analysis. No difference was found in baseline information (p &gt; 0.05). After pooling up the data of overall postoperative complications, no significant difference was found between EIPL group and No EIPL group (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.51 to 1.53, P = 0.65). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between EIPL group and No EIPL group in terms of OS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.64, P = 0.49), DFS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.33, P = 0.87), and PRFS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.43, P = 0.86). In terms of subgroup analysis of OS, no significant difference was found as well (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.34, P = 0.69).ConclusionsEIPL did not bring benefit in terms of short-term outcomes or survival. Therefore, EIPL is not recommended for patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Ascites in Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Surgery

We aimed to determine the frequency and clinical significance of ascites that developed during the follow-up period in patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer. The study included 577 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy. Among them, 184 showed ascites in postoperative follow-up images. Benign ascites was observed in 131 of 490 patients without recurrence, 48 patients (of 87) with recurrence had malignancy-related ascites, and the remaining 5 patients had ascites only prior to recurrence. In most patients without recurrence (97.7%) and in 50% of patients with malignancy-related ascites, the ascites was small in volume and located in the pelvic cavity at the time that it was first identified. However, with the exception of nine patients, malignancy-related pelvic ascites occurred simultaneously or after obvious recurrence. Of those nine patients who had minimal pelvic ascites before obvious recurrence, only one had a clear association with a malignancy-related ascites. In the multivariate analysis, an age of ≤45 was the only independent risk factor for the occurrence of benign ascites. A small volume of pelvic ascites fluid is common in young gastric cancer patients who do not have recurrence after gastrectomy, regardless of sex. It is rare for ascites to be the first manifestation of recurrence.

Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio in Patients with Gastric Cancer After Curative Gastrectomy: A Large sample, Single center Retrospective Study

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic value of Metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) after curative gastrectomy and the potential for new indicators to strengthen the current guidelines.Methods:We retrospectively examined 3864 patients with GC who underwent curative gastrectomy between February 2011 and February 2016. Patients were classified into low-MLNR (L-MLNR), and high-MLNR (H-MLNR) groups according to adjusted X-tile cutoff-value of 0.25 for MLNR, and their clinicopathological characteristics and survival rates were compared.Results: Survival analysis indicated that MLNR was negatively associated with overall survival (OS) (P<0.001) and was an independent prognostic predictor in 3864 GC patients (P<0.001). Stratum analysis and univariate COX proportional hazards analysis were performed to validate the prognostic value of MLNR in various subgroups with clinicopathological characteristics (gender, age at surgery, tumor location, tumor size, type of gastrectomy, T stage, N stage, ELN, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and TNM stage). MLNR is a prognostic indicator for patients with GC, regardless whether the number of lymph nodes examined is <16 or ≥16.Conclusions:The MLNR may become a new indicator for evaluating prognosis of patients with curative gastrectomy and complement the current guidelines.