scholarly journals Endovascular Treatment of Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Mid Term Results of a Single Centre Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 45-46
Author(s):  
Alice Lopes ◽  
Ryan Melo ◽  
Ruy Fernandes e Fernandes ◽  
Pedro Amorim ◽  
Gonçalo Sobrinho ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. C. Chan ◽  
J. P. Morales ◽  
N. Gulamhuseinwala ◽  
T. Sabharwal ◽  
M. Carmichael ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 616-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Fossaceca ◽  
G. Guzzardi ◽  
P. Cerini ◽  
M. Di Terlizzi ◽  
E. Malatesta ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 204800401984550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocco Giudice ◽  
Ottavia Borghese ◽  
Giorgio Sbenaglia ◽  
Carlo Coscarella ◽  
Claudia De Gregorio ◽  
...  

Objectives The aim of this study was to present a single-centre experience with EndoAnchors in patients who underwent endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms with challenging proximal neck, both in the prevention and treatment of endograft migration and type Ia endoleaks. Methods We retrospectively analysed 17 consecutive patients treated with EndoAnchors between June 2015 and May 2018 at our institution. EndoAnchors were applied during the initial endovascular aneurysm repair procedure (primary implant) to prevent proximal neck complications in difficult anatomies (nine patients), and in the follow-up after aneurysm exclusion (secondary implant) to correct type Ia endoleak and/or stent-graft migration (eight patients). Results Mean time for anchors implant was 23 min (range 12–41), with a mean of 5 EndoAnchors deployed per patient. Six patients in the secondary implant group required a proximal cuff due to stent-graft migration ≥10 mm. Technical success was achieved in all cases, with no complications related to deployment of the anchors. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range 4–39, interquartile range 9–20), there were no aneurysm-related deaths or aneurysm ruptures, and all patients were free from reinterventions. CT-scan surveillance showed no evidence of type Ia endoleak, anchors dislodgement or stent-graft migration, with a mean reduction of aneurysm diameter of 0.4 mm (range 0–19); there was no sac growth or aortic neck enlargement in any case. Conclusions EndoAnchors can be safely used in the prevention and treatment of type Ia endoleaks in patients with challenging aortic necks, with good results in terms of sac exclusion and diameter reduction in the mid-term follow-up.


2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Gerassimidis ◽  
Christos D. Karkos ◽  
Dimitrios G. Karamanos ◽  
Konstantinos O. Papazoglou ◽  
Dimitrios N. Papadimitriou ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eduardo K. Saadi ◽  
Fernando Gastaldo ◽  
Luiz H. Dussin ◽  
Alcides J. Zago ◽  
Gilberto Barbosa ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diehm ◽  
Schmidli ◽  
Dai-Do ◽  
Baumgartner

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a potentially fatal condition with risk of rupture increasing as maximum AAA diameter increases. It is agreed upon that open surgical or endovascular treatment is indicated if maximum AAA diameter exceeds 5 to 5.5cm. Continuing aneurysmal degeneration of aortoiliac arteries accounts for significant morbidity, especially in patients undergoing endovascular AAA repair. Purpose of this review is to give an overview of the current evidence of medical treatment of AAA and describe prospects of potential pharmacological approaches towards prevention of aneurysmal degeneration of small AAAs and to highlight possible adjunctive medical treatment approaches after open surgical or endovascular AAA therapy.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (S 01) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ebert ◽  
M. Langer ◽  
P. Uhrmeister

SummaryThe endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms has generated a great deal of interest since the early 1990s, and many different devices are currently available. The procedure of endovascular repair has been evaluated in many institutions and the different devices are compared. The first results were encouraging, but complications like endoleak, dislocation or thrombosis of the graft occurred. By the available devices the stent application is only promising, if the known exclusion criteria are strictly respected. Therefore a careful preinterventional assessment of the patient by different imaging modalities is necessary. As the available results up to now are preliminary and the durability of the devices has to be controlled, multicenter studies are required to improve the devices and observe their long- term success in the exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document