scholarly journals Air quality accountability: Developing long-term daily time series of pollutant changes and uncertainties in Atlanta, Georgia resulting from the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments

2019 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 522-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas R.F. Henneman ◽  
Cong Liu ◽  
Howard Chang ◽  
James Mulholland ◽  
Paige Tolbert ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winston Harrington ◽  
Richard Morgenstern ◽  
Jhih-Shyang Shih ◽  
Michelle L. Bell

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Stieb ◽  
Richard T. Burnett ◽  
Marc Smith-Doiron ◽  
Orly Brion ◽  
Hwashin Hyun Shin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reyhaneh Hashemi ◽  
Pierre Brigode ◽  
Pierre-André Garambois ◽  
Pierre Javelle

<p>In the field of deep learning, LSTM lies in the category of recurrent neural network architectures. The distinctive capability of LSTM is learning non-linear long-term dependency structures. This makes LSTM a promising candidate for prediction tasks in non-linear time dependent systems such as prediction of runoff in a catchment. This work presents a comparative framework between an LSTM model and a proven conceptual model, namely GR4J. Performance of the two models is studied with respect to length of study period, surface area, and hydrological regime of 491 gauged French catchments covering a wide range of geographical and hydroclimatic conditions.  </p><p>Meteorological forcing data (features) include daily time series of catchment-averaged total precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, and air temperature. The hydrometric data consists of daily time series of discharge (target variable). The length of study period varies within the sample depending on the availability of full-record of discharge and, on average,  is 15 [years].</p><p>In equivalent experimental scenarios, features are kept same in both models and the target variable is predicted for each catchment by both models. Their performance is then evaluated and compared. To do this, the available time series are split into three independent subsequent subsets, namely, training set, validation set, and evaluation set, constituting, respectively, 50%, 20%, and 30% of the study period. The  LSTM model is trained based on the training and validation sets and predicts the target on the evaluation set. The four parameters of GR4J model are calibrated using the training set and the calibrated model is then used to estimate discharges corresponding to the evaluation set. </p><p>The results suggest that the hydrological regime of catchment is the main factor behind the performance pattern of the LSTM model. According to the results, in the hydrological regimes Uniform and Nival, involving flow regimes with dominant long-term processes, the LSTM model outperforms GR4J model. However, in Pluvial-Mediterranean and Pluvial-Nival regimes characterised with pluri-season peaks, the LSTM model underperforms GR4J model.</p>


Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 460
Author(s):  
Jiun-Horng Tsai ◽  
Ming-Ye Lee ◽  
Hung-Lung Chiang

The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) measurement was employed for evaluating the effectiveness of fine particulate matter control strategies in Taiwan. There are three scenarios as follows: (I) the 2014 baseline year emission, (II) 2020 emissions reduced via the Clean Air Act (CAA), and (III) other emissions reduced stringently via the Clean Air Act. Based on the Taiwan Emission Data System (TEDs) 8.1, established in 2014, the emission of particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) was 73.5 thousand tons y−1, that of SOx was 121.3 thousand tons y−1, and that of NOx was 404.4 thousand tons y−1 in Taiwan. The CMAQ model simulation indicated that the PM2.5 concentration was 21.9 μg m−3. This could be underestimated by 24% in comparison with data from the ambient air quality monitoring stations of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA). The results of the simulation of the PM2.5 concentration showed high PM2.5 concentrations in central and southwestern Taiwan, especially in Taichung and Kaohsiung. Compared to scenario I, the average annual concentrations of PM2.5 for scenario II and scenario III showed reductions of 20.1% and 28.8%, respectively. From the results derived from the simulation, it can be seen that control of NOx emissions may improve daily airborne PM2.5 concentrations in Taiwan significantly and control of directly emitted PM2.5 emissions may improve airborne PM2.5 concentrations each month. Nevertheless, the results reveal that the preliminary control plan could not achievethe air quality standard. Therefore, the efficacy and effectiveness of the control measures must be considered to better reduce emissions in the future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 737-760
Author(s):  
Sadame M. Yimer ◽  
Navneet Kumar ◽  
Abderrazak Bouanani ◽  
Bernhard Tischbein ◽  
Christian Borgemeister

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document