scholarly journals Physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling and human biomonitoring data for mixture risk assessment

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 105978
Author(s):  
Julia Pletz ◽  
Samantha Blakeman ◽  
Alicia Paini ◽  
Nikolaos Parissis ◽  
Andrew Worth ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilse Ottenbros ◽  
Eva Govarts ◽  
Erik Lebret ◽  
Roel Vermeulen ◽  
Greet Schoeters ◽  
...  

Introduction: Humans are exposed to multiple environmental chemicals via different sources resulting in complex real-life exposure patterns. Insight into these patterns is important for applications such as linkage to health effects and (mixture) risk assessment. By providing internal exposure levels of (metabolites of) chemicals, biomonitoring studies can provide snapshots of exposure patterns and factors that drive them. Presentation of biomonitoring data in networks facilitates the detection of such exposure patterns and allows for the systematic comparison of observed exposure patterns between datasets and strata within datasets.Methods: We demonstrate the use of network techniques in human biomonitoring data from cord blood samples collected in three campaigns of the Flemish Environment and Health Studies (FLEHS) (sampling years resp. 2002–2004, 2008–2009, and 2013–2014). Measured biomarkers were multiple organochlorine compounds, PFAS and metals. Comparative network analysis (CNA) was conducted to systematically compare networks between sampling campaigns, smoking status during pregnancy, and maternal pre-pregnancy BMI.Results: Network techniques offered an intuitive approach to visualize complex correlation structures within human biomonitoring data. The identification of groups of highly connected biomarkers, “communities,” within these networks highlighted which biomarkers should be considered collectively in the analysis and interpretation of epidemiological studies or in the design of toxicological mixture studies. Network analyses demonstrated in our example to which extent biomarker networks and its communities changed across the sampling campaigns, smoking status during pregnancy, and maternal pre-pregnancy BMI.Conclusion: Network analysis is a data-driven and intuitive screening method when dealing with multiple exposure biomarkers, which can easily be upscaled to high dimensional HBM datasets, and can inform mixture risk assessment approaches.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 8-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna K.L. Johansson ◽  
Julie Boberg ◽  
Marianne Dybdahl ◽  
Marta Axelstad ◽  
Anne Marie Vinggaard

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Ching Y. Wang ◽  
Glenn E. Rice ◽  
Linda K. Teuschler ◽  
Joan Colman ◽  
Raymond S. H. Yang

Both the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) and the Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group (TPHCWG) developed fraction-based approaches for assessing human health risks posed by total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) mixtures in the environment. Both organizations defined TPH fractions based on their expected environmental fate and by analytical chemical methods. They derived toxicity values for selected compounds within each fraction and used these as surrogates to assess hazard or risk of exposure to the whole fractions. Membership in a TPH fraction is generally defined by the number of carbon atoms in a compound and by a compound's equivalent carbon (EC) number index, which can predict its environmental fate. Here, we systematically and objectively re-evaluate the assignment of TPH to specific fractions using comparative molecular field analysis and hierarchical clustering. The approach is transparent and reproducible, reducing inherent reliance on judgment when toxicity information is limited. Our evaluation of membership in these fractions is highly consistent (̃80% on average across various fractions) with the empirical approach of MADEP and TPHCWG. Furthermore, the results support the general methodology of mixture risk assessment to assess both cancer and noncancer risk values after the application of fractionation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document