Prolonged depth electrode implantation in the limbic system increases the severity of status epilepticus in rats

2014 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 802-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens P. Bankstahl ◽  
Claudia Brandt ◽  
Wolfgang Löscher
Author(s):  
Karl Roessler ◽  
Fabian Winter ◽  
Tobias Wilken ◽  
Ekaterina Pataraia ◽  
Magdalena Mueller-Gerbl ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Depth electrode implantation for invasive monitoring in epilepsy surgery has become a standard procedure. We describe a new frameless stereotactic intervention using robot-guided laser beam for making precise bone channels for depth electrode placement. Methods A laboratory investigation on a head cadaver specimen was performed using a CT scan planning of depth electrodes in various positions. Precise bone channels were made by a navigated robot-driven laser beam (erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet [Er:YAG], 2.94-μm wavelength,) instead of twist drill holes. Entry point and target point precision was calculated using postimplantation CT scans and comparison to the preoperative trajectory plan. Results Frontal, parietal, and occipital bone channels for bolt implantation were made. The occipital bone channel had an angulation of more than 60 degrees to the surface. Bolts and depth electrodes were implanted solely guided by the trajectory given by the precise bone channels. The mean depth electrode length was 45.5 mm. Entry point deviation was 0.73 mm (±0.66 mm SD) and target point deviation was 2.0 mm (±0.64 mm SD). Bone channel laser time was ∼30 seconds per channel. Altogether, the implantation time was ∼10 to 15 minutes per electrode. Conclusion Navigated robot-assisted laser for making precise bone channels for depth electrode implantation in epilepsy surgery is a promising new, exact and straightforward implantation technique and may have many advantages over twist drill hole implantation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 399-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles N. Munyon ◽  
Mohamad Z. Koubeissi ◽  
Tanvir U. Syed ◽  
Hans O. Lüders ◽  
Jonathan P. Miller

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-270
Author(s):  
Kensuke Daida ◽  
Kenya Nishioka ◽  
Masashi Takanashi ◽  
Manami Kobayashi ◽  
Keisuke Yoshikawa ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie J. Van Gompel ◽  
Fredric B. Meyer ◽  
W. Richard Marsh ◽  
Kendall H. Lee ◽  
Gregory A. Worrell

Object Intracranial monitoring for temporal lobe seizure localization to differentiate neocortical from mesial temporal onset seizures requires both neocortical subdural grids and hippocampal depth electrode implantation. There are 2 basic techniques for hippocampal depth electrode implantation. This first technique uses a stereotactically guided 8-contact depth electrode directed along the long axis of the hippocampus to the amygdala via an occipital bur hole. The second technique involves direct placement of 2 or 3 4-contact depth electrodes perpendicular to the temporal lobe through the middle temporal gyrus and overlying subdural grid. The purpose of this study was to determine whether one technique was superior to the other by examining monitoring success and complications. Methods Between 1997 and 2005, 41 patients underwent invasive seizure monitoring with both temporal subdural grids and depth electrodes placed in 2 ways. Patients in Group A underwent the first technique, and patients in Group B underwent the second technique. Results Group A consisted of 26 patients and Group B 15 patients. There were no statistically significant differences between Groups A and B regarding demographics, monitoring duration, seizure localization, or outcome (Engel classification). There was a statistically significant difference at the point in time at which these techniques were used: Group A represented more patients earlier in the series than Group B (p < 0.05). The complication rate attributable to the grids and depth electrodes was 0% in each group. It was more likely that the depth electrodes were placed through the grid if there was a prior resection and the patient was undergoing a new evaluation (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Group A procedures took significantly longer than Group B procedures. Conclusions In this patient series, there was no difference in efficacy of monitoring, complications, or outcome between hippocampal depth electrodes placed laterally through temporal grids or using an occipital bur hole stereotactic approach. Placement of the depth electrodes perpendicularly through the grids and middle temporal gyrus is technically more practical because multiple head positions and redraping are unnecessary, resulting in shorter operative times with comparable results.


Author(s):  
T.M. Peters ◽  
André Olivier

SUMMARY:We describe a computer program which facilitates the analysis of a series of C.T. scans made while a stereotaxic frame is fixed to the patient.The program has 2 modes of operation:a) The operator may select a region and determine the three-dimensional frame coordinate.b) The operator may select a set of frame coordinates and have the computer program display these at the appropriate sites on the C.T. scans. If these sites are the positions of depth electrodes, then a recording of the epileptic spike activity may be displayed at the appropriate sites on the scans.


1995 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. S228-S230 ◽  
Author(s):  
YOKO NAKASU ◽  
SATOSHI NAKASU ◽  
HIROHIKO KIZUKI ◽  
SHUJI UEMURA ◽  
SHIGEHIRO MORIKAWA ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 478-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Bortel ◽  
Maxime Lévesque ◽  
Giuseppe Biagini ◽  
Jean Gotman ◽  
Massimo Avoli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document