scholarly journals Complete duplication of the penis - A case report

2021 ◽  
pp. 101892
Author(s):  
Saidanvar Agzamkhodjayev ◽  
Kobiljon Ergashev ◽  
Zafar Abdullayev ◽  
Asqar Tursunov ◽  
Ruslan Batrutdinov
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-74
Author(s):  
Agbeille Mohamed F ◽  
Agossou J ◽  
Gandaho I ◽  
Kpanidja MG ◽  
Noudamadjo A ◽  
...  

Upper urinary tract abnormalities are relatively common and may be diagnosed before or at birth. Some cases will be seen during complications that most often are obstructive. We herein report one case of complete right ureter duplication revealed by sepsis. The case involved one little girl aged 3 years, referred from a peripheral health center for prolonged fever. Physical examination found out a right flank mass connecting with the lumbar spine, renal ballottement, and pain due to a blow to the right flank. Further explorations helped establish the diagnosis of complete duplication of the right ureter with the destruction of the upper renal pelvis. Little girl benefitted from a dual antibiotic therapy combined with partial nephrectomy of the right kidney upper pole. Infectious are serious complications in upper urinary tract obstructions resulting in kidney destruction; therefore, early diagnosis is required.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Khorramirouz ◽  
Amin Bagheri ◽  
Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh

Bladder duplication is a rare congenital anomaly which occurs in the sagittal or coronal plane and it can be associated with other anomalies. It has been previously classified as complete duplication of the bladder and urethra or incomplete duplication with two bladders and common urethra. However, complete duplication of bladder with a single urethra has been rarely reported. Herein, we present a patient with a different variation of bladder duplication in the coronal plane with two urethras originating from the main bladder and associated glans diphallia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (No. 1) ◽  
pp. 49-49
Author(s):  
M. Karabagli ◽  
B. Karan ◽  
U. Ugurlu ◽  
Z. Mutlu ◽  
F. Yildirim ◽  
...  

The last sentence on page 230  “Also, this is the first case in veterinary literature in which karyotypic analysis was performed.”  has been corrected as follows:  “Also, this is the second case in the veterinary literature in which karyotypic analysis was performed and as in the previous case report (Zucker et al. 1993), there was no chromosomal abnormality determined.”    The sentence has been corrected upon a notice of Dr. Zucker sent to the corresponding author on December 21, 2018. The authors apologize herewith to Dr. Zucker for their unfortunate oversight.


1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Berrocal ◽  
Silvina Novak ◽  
Antonia Arjonilla ◽  
Julia Gutiérrez ◽  
Consuelo Prieto ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1605-1606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arbay O. Ciftci ◽  
Mehmet E. Şenocak ◽  
Nebil Büyükpamukçu ◽  
Akgün Hiçsönmez

1980 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 773-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Esham ◽  
Homer A. Holt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document