Group size and the (in)efficiency of pure public good provision

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 272-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Diederich ◽  
Timo Goeschl ◽  
Israel Waichman
2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Cornes ◽  
Todd Sandler

Abstract In the pure public good model, the Nash equilibrium associated with one initial income distribution may Pareto dominate the equilibrium associated with another distribution of the same aggregate income. We explore this possibility and examine its implications for Pareto-improving policy intervention by undertaking a comparative static analysis of Pareto-improving tax-financed increases in pure public good provision. Under some circumstances, a government can engineer policies that raise public good provision while increasing the well-being of contributors and noncontributors. Crucial factors promoting this outcome involve a large number of noncontributors, a high marginal valuation for the public good by non-contributors and a large aggregate response of contributors to changes in their income.


Economica ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 52 (205) ◽  
pp. 103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Cornes ◽  
Todd Sandler

2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL PECORINO ◽  
AKRAM TEMIMI

Games ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
David Jimenez-Gomez

I develop a dynamic model with forward looking agents, and show that social pressure is effective in generating provision in a public good game: after a small group of agents start contributing to the public good, other agents decide to contribute as well due to a fear of being punished, and this generates contagion in the network. In contrast to earlier models in the literature, contagion happens fast, as part of the best response of fully rational individuals. The network topology has implications for whether contagion starts and the extent to which it spreads. I find conditions under which an agent decides to be the first to contribute in order to generate contagion in the network, as well as conditions for contribution due to a self-fulfilling fear of social pressure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document