Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery—A Systematic Review and Assessment of State of the Art

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-359
Author(s):  
Luckshmana Jeyaseelan ◽  
Francesc Malagelada
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-98
Author(s):  
Edvin Selmani ◽  
Fatmir Brahimi ◽  
Leard Duraj ◽  
Valbona Selmani ◽  
Gjergji Syko ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Maffulli ◽  
U. G. Longo ◽  
A. Marinozzi ◽  
V. Denaro

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edvin Selmani ◽  
Fatmir Brahimi ◽  
Leard Duraj ◽  
Valbona Selmani ◽  
Gjergji Syko ◽  
...  

This systematic review aims to illustrate the published results of “minimally invasive” procedures for correction of hallux valgus. Based on former systematic reviews on that topic, the literature search was organised by two independent investigators. MEDLINE was systematically searched for available studies. The keywords used were “hallux valgus”, “bunion”, “percutaneous surgery”, “minimally invasive surgery”, “arthroscopy”, “Bosch” and “SERI”. Studies were assessed using the level of evidence rating. A total of 21 papers were included in this review. These studies described a total of 1,750 patients with 2,195 instances of percutaneous, minimally invasive or arthroscopic hallux valgus surgery. Clinical reports of results after minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery at meetings are common. Published results in peer-reviewed journals are less common and the majority of papers are level IV studies according to the level of evidence ratings. We found one level II and three level III studies. Reported complications seem to be less than one may see in one’s own clinical practice. This possible bias may be related to the fact that most studies are published by centres performing primarily minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-356
Author(s):  
Maninder Shah Singh ◽  
Ankit Khurana ◽  
Darshan Kapoor ◽  
Shyam Katekar ◽  
Arun Kumar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 625-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesc Malagelada ◽  
Cyrus Sahirad ◽  
Miki Dalmau-Pastor ◽  
Jordi Vega ◽  
Rej Bhumbra ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Cavallo ◽  
Xiaochun Zhao ◽  
Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar ◽  
Miriam Weiss ◽  
Sirin Gandhi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1276-1287
Author(s):  
Brigida Anna Maiorano ◽  
Giovanni Schinzari ◽  
Sabrina Chiloiro ◽  
Felicia Visconti ◽  
Domenico Milardi ◽  
...  

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are rare tumors having usually an indolent behavior, but sometimes with unpredictable aggressiveness. PanNETs are more often non-functioning (NF), unable to produce functioning hormones, while 10-30% present as functioning (F) - PanNETs, such as insulinomas , gastrinomas , and other rare tumors. Diagnostic and prognostic markers, but also new therapeutic targets, are still lacking. Proteomics techniques represent therefore promising approaches for the future management of PanNETs. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the state of the art of proteomics in PanNETs. A total of 9 studies were included, focusing both on NF- and F-PanNETs. Indeed, proteomics is useful for the diagnosis, the prognosis and the detection of therapeutic targets. However, further studies are required. It is also warranted to standardize the analysis methods and the collection techniques, in order to validate proteins with a relevance in the personalized approach to PanNETs management.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 788-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Ricci ◽  
Riccardo Casadei ◽  
Giovanni Taffurelli ◽  
Carlo Alberto Pacilio ◽  
Marco Ricciardiello ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document