Mind the gap: subjects below world health organization 4th ed (who 4) but above who 5th ed (who 5) minimum reference values have substantial odds of abnormal semen results on subsequent testing

2013 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. S435-S436
Author(s):  
K. Baker ◽  
Y. Barazani ◽  
E. Sabanegh
Urology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 831-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Ju Lee ◽  
Sung Yong Cho ◽  
Jae-Seung Paick ◽  
Soo Woong Kim

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Vieira

Semen analysis is of paramount importance to study potential male fertility, couple's infertility, the effects of gonadotoxic agents on spermatogenesis and as follow-up test during treatment of male infertility. Since 1987, the World Health Organization proposes the standardization of this test and its reference values based on population-based data. The latest version of the World Health Organization guidelines was published in 2010. It introduced a new methodology that produced new references values, which triggered a discussion that lies inconclusive. We revised the original World Health Organization paper focusing on methodological changes and its results, the new references values and their impact on clinical practice.


2011 ◽  
Vol 95 (8) ◽  
pp. 2711-2714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda S. Setti ◽  
Rita de Cássia S. Figueira ◽  
Daniela P.A.F. Braga ◽  
Assumpto Iaconelli ◽  
Edson Borges

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor G. Cooper ◽  
Elizabeth Noonan ◽  
Sigrid von Eckardstein ◽  
Jacques Auger ◽  
H.W. Gordon Baker ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3213
Author(s):  
Piotr Sokol ◽  
Panagiotis Drakopoulos ◽  
Nikolaos P. Polyzos

Since the publication of the first edition of the WHO (World Health Organization) Laboratory Manual for the examination of Human Semen in 1980, the reference values of sperm parameters have been updated on four occasions. Currently and globally, most of the laboratories analyzing semen samples use the latest, 5th edition of the manual that recommends ejaculatory abstinence from two to seven days before producing the sample for examination. While this standardized interval of time facilitates the interpretation of the results and research, no solid evidence exists to support the WHO-recommended abstinence time for a semen analysis in order to optimize clinical outcomes after assisted reproduction. Most of the studies refer to different clinical outcomes, different groups of patients and different editions of the WHO Laboratory Manual, including heterogeneous intervals of abstinence or sperm parameters. The aim of the current systematic review was to evaluate available evidence correlating ejaculatory abstinence time with clinical outcomes and sperm parameters analyzed according to the last edition of the World Health Organization Laboratory Manual reference values in different male populations. The results from the included studies indicate that WHO abstinence recommendations may need revision, given that a shorter ejaculatory abstinence interval appears to be associated with improved sperm parameters, such as sperm DNA fragmentation, progressive motility or morphology, while evidence suggests a potential increase in embryo euploidy rates and pregnancy outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document