Fruit anatomy of species of Solanum sect. Acanthophora (Solanaceae)

Flora ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 204 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco E. Chiarini ◽  
Gloria E. Barboza
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 807-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Fernández ◽  
Cecilia Ezcurra ◽  
Carolina I. Calviño
Keyword(s):  

PhytoKeys ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 47-54
Author(s):  
Andres Moreira-Muñoz ◽  
Melica Muñoz-Schick

Although the original description of Solanum polyphyllum Phil. was made in 1891, this species was not seen until it was re-discovered 128 years later in 2019 in the Atacama Desert. Fruits and seeds were previously unknown and a complete description is provided here. This species was not treated in the most recent monograph of Solanum sect. Regmandra, but it should be incorporated in this section due to its glabrous, sessile and entire leaves, which are decurrent onto the stem. Morphologically, S. polyphyllum is similar to S. paposanum, also of section Regmandra, but differs in the entire leaves (against margins with 4–5 acute lobes in S. paposanum) and glabrous leaves (moderately pubescent adaxially and velutinous abaxially in S. paposanum). The rediscovery of S. polyphyllum at a new locality at the same altitudinal belt as the type, re-affirms its restricted distribution and endemism and supports a potential conservation status as an endangered species.


1983 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Dvořák

Data on chromosome pairing in haploids and interspecific hybrids of Solanum, sect. Petota reported in the literature were used to determine whether the diploidlike chromosome pairing that occurs in some of the polyploid species of the section is regulated by the genotype or brought about by some other mechanism. The following trends emerged from these data. Most of the polyploid × polyploid hybrids had high numbers of univalents, which seemed to indicate that the polyploid species were constructed from diverse genomes. Haploids, except for those derived from S. tuberosum, had incomplete chromosome pairing. All hybrids from diploid × diploid crosses had more or less regular chromosome pairing, which suggested that all investigated diploid species have the same genome. Likewise, hybrids from polyploid × diploid crosses had high levels of chromosome pairing. These paradoxical results are best explained if it is assumed that (i) the genotypes of most polyploid species, but not those of the diploid species, suppress heterogenetic pairing, (ii) that nonstructural chromosome differentiation is present among the genomes of both diploid and polyploid species, and (iii) the presence of the genome of a diploid species in a polyploid × diploid hybrid results in promotion of heterogenetic pairing. It is, therefore, concluded that heterogenetic pairing in most of the polyploid species is genetically suppressed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M. Clausen ◽  
Veronica N. Ispizua ◽  
Hugo M. Atencio ◽  
Mirta Calandroni ◽  
Ariana Digilio
Keyword(s):  
Ex Situ ◽  

Las especies vegetales silvestres emparentadas con los cultivos, contribuyen a la seguridad alimentaria y la sustentabilidad ambiental, pero están sometidas a un creciente riesgo de amenaza en sus hábitats naturales. Las estrategias globales de conservación para su protección son la conservación ex situ (fuera de sus ambientes naturales) y la conservación in situ (en sus ambientes naturales). La conservación in situ de especies silvestres de papa es una actividad prioritaria en la estrategia mundial formulada para la conservación de especies silvestres emparentadas con los cultivos. Como resultado de la conservación ex situ implementada para especies silvestres de papa en nuestro país, se dispone de germoplasma e información referida a su distribución en el Banco de Germoplasma de la EEA Balcarce, INTA, y la distribución de estas especies coincide con muchas áreas protegidas. Con el objetivo de validar cuáles especies se encuentran en áreas protegidas, como un primer paso para promover su conservación in situ, se ha iniciado la prospección y colecta en las mismas. Se presentan las especies de papa silvestres identificadas e incluidas en un número importante de áreas protegidas del país


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Hardigan ◽  
John Bamberg ◽  
C. Robin Buell ◽  
David S. Douches

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1114-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ionaldo José L. D. Basílio ◽  
Renata K. P. Moura ◽  
Jnanabrata Bhattacharyya ◽  
Maria de Fátima Agra

1981 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward E. Schilling
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document