Adapting modern strategic decision support tools in the participatory strategy process—a case study of a forest research station

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena A. Leskinen ◽  
Pekka Leskinen ◽  
Mikko Kurttila ◽  
Jyrki Kangas ◽  
Miika Kajanus
2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Vesier

Abstract Effectively managing unpredictability requires decision support tools that can predict the financial and business outcomes of various supply chain strategies. This paper will discuss the role of these decision support tools and their characteristics as well as review a case study. In the case study, decision support tools facilitated development of strategies that increased after tax profit by $140 Million. These strategies included: • Reliability improvement strategy: Identifying the reliability improvements that offered the biggest profitability impact. • Supply chain strategy: Defining inventory management and production scheduling rules that ensured order shipment within two days. • Capital investment strategy: Defining when new capacity should come on line as well as the minimum capital investment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris McIntyre

This article explores the motivations of public sector managers in developing and deploying digital tools to support decision making at the front lines of public service delivery. Two digital decision support tools created by New Zealand’s Ministry of Social Development are presented as a case study, drawing primarily on semi-structured interviews with senior managers. Results provide empirical evidence that public sector managers deploy digital tools not to curtail, but to support street-level bureaucrats’ discretion. Managers appear to be motivated not by increased control over front-line staff, but, rather, by improving clients’ experience of the system and decreasing longterm service costs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 581
Author(s):  
Claire Rapp ◽  
Emily Rabung ◽  
Robyn Wilson ◽  
Eric Toman

In the United States, many decision support tools exist to provide fire managers with weather and fire behaviour information to inform and facilitate risk-based decision-making. Relatively little is known about how managers use these tools in the field and when and how they may serve to influence decisions. To address this gap, we conducted exploratory interviews with 27 wildfire management and fire weather professionals across the United States. Results reveal that barriers to the use of decision support tools are structural and social. Specifically, fire weather and behaviour models may not generate reliable output and managers may not use the information they provide, but technical specialists on incident management teams (IMTs) play an active role in trying to overcome these barriers through their technical expertise and their relationships with other members of the IMT. Although researchers suggest tools such as the Wildland Fire Decision Support System (WFDSS) inform broad, strategic decision-making for line officers and IMTs, our results suggest fire weather and behaviour models are also important for communication and strategic or tactical planning within the IMT, especially for operations. We find that ultimately, managers may make use of fire weather and behaviour models, but they do not dictate decisions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 206 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Cotter ◽  
Folkard Asch ◽  
Bayuh Belay Abera ◽  
Boshuwenda Andre Chuma ◽  
Kalimuthu Senthilkumar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document