Societal benefits from wildfire mitigation activities through payments for watershed services: Insights from Colorado

2022 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 102661
Author(s):  
Kelly W. Jones ◽  
Benjamin Gannon ◽  
Thomas Timberlake ◽  
James L. Chamberlain ◽  
Brett Wolk
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly W. Jones

Payments for watershed services (PWS) programs are becoming a popular governance approach in the western United States (US) to fund forest management aimed at source water protection. In this paper we conduct a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of one of the first collaboratively funded PWS programs in the US, located in the municipal watersheds servicing Denver, Colorado. We combine wildfire modeling, sediment modeling, and primary and secondary data on economic values to quantify the impact of the program on protecting multiple values at risk. Our results show that while the program has led to diverse societal benefits, it is only economically efficient (benefit-cost ratio greater than one) when all co-benefits beyond source water protection are considered and fuels treatments are assumed to encounter wildfire. When the probability of wildfire is accounted for, economic benefits would need to be triple what was estimated in our analysis to achieve economic efficiency. Our findings suggest that improving spatial prioritization of interventions would increase economic benefits and better data on treatment placement and costs would help facilitate future CBA of PWS programs focused on wildfire mitigation.


Author(s):  
Jeremy Mattson ◽  
Del Peterson

The objective of this research was to measure the benefits of rural and small urban transit services in Minnesota. The study accomplished this by first identifying, describing, and classifying the potential benefits of transit. Second, a method was developed to measure these benefits. Where possible, benefits were quantified in dollar values. Other benefits that could not be quantified in monetary terms were either quantified in another way or described qualitatively. The study included an analysis of societal benefits and economic impacts within local communities. Third, the developed method was applied to a series of six case studies across Greater Minnesota. Data were collected through onboard rider surveys for each of the six transit agencies. Total benefits and benefit-cost ratios were estimated for the six transit agencies—all showed benefits that exceeded costs—and results were generalized to Greater Minnesota. Economic impacts were also estimated showing the effect on jobs, labor income, and value added. This research provides information to assess the benefits of public spending on transit, which gives decision makers the data needed to inform investment decisions.


1994 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Schwartz

2014 ◽  
pp. 639-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahadev G. Bhat ◽  
Michael McClain ◽  
Doris Ombara ◽  
William Kasanga ◽  
George Atisa

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel J. Kwayu ◽  
Susannah M. Sallu ◽  
Jouni Paavola

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document