Visual cueing combined with treadmill training in Parkinson's disease: Effects on gait and balance

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. S79-S80
Author(s):  
C. Schlick ◽  
S. Wagner ◽  
A. Ernst ◽  
J. Ilmberger
2020 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 342-343
Author(s):  
J. Seuthe ◽  
N. D’Cruz ◽  
P. Ginis ◽  
J.S. Becktepe ◽  
B. Weisser ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 431-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelien Nackaerts ◽  
Alice Nieuwboer ◽  
Sanne Broeder ◽  
Bouwien C. M. Smits-Engelsman ◽  
Stephan P. Swinnen ◽  
...  

Background. Handwriting is often impaired in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Several studies have shown that writing in PD benefits from the use of cues. However, this was typically studied with writing and drawing sizes that are usually not used in daily life. Objective. This study examines the effect of visual cueing on a prewriting task at small amplitudes (≤1.0 cm) in PD patients and healthy controls to better understand the working action of cueing for writing. Methods. A total of 15 PD patients and 15 healthy, age-matched controls performed a prewriting task at 0.6 cm and 1.0 cm in the presence and absence of visual cues (target lines). Writing amplitude, variability of amplitude, and speed were chosen as dependent variables, measured using a newly developed touch-sensitive tablet. Results. Cueing led to immediate improvements in writing size, variability of writing size, and speed in both groups in the 1.0 cm condition. However, when writing at 0.6 cm with cues, a decrease in writing size was apparent in both groups ( P < .001) and the difference in variability of amplitude between cued and uncued writing disappeared. In addition, the writing speed of controls decreased when the cue was present. Conclusions. Visual target lines of 1.0 cm improved the writing of sequential loops in contrast to lines spaced at 0.6 cm. These results illustrate that, unlike for gait, visual cueing for fine-motor tasks requires a differentiated approach, taking into account the possible increases of accuracy constraints imposed by cueing.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 817-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen G Canning ◽  
Natalie E Allen ◽  
Catherine M Dean ◽  
Lina Goh ◽  
Victor SC Fung

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 499-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Pelosin ◽  
Emanuela Faelli ◽  
Francesco Lofrano ◽  
Laura Avanzino ◽  
Lucio Marinelli ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelien Nackaerts ◽  
Alice Nieuwboer ◽  
Elisabetta Farella

Recent research showed that visual cueing can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on handwriting of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and healthy controls depending on the circumstances. Hence, using other sensory modalities to deliver cueing or feedback may be a valuable alternative. Therefore, the current study compared the effects of short-term training with either continuous visual cues or intermittent intelligent verbal feedback. Ten PD patients and nine healthy controls were randomly assigned to one of these training modes. To assess transfer of learning, writing performance was assessed in the absence of cueing and feedback on both trained and untrained writing sequences. The feedback pen and a touch-sensitive writing tablet were used for testing. Both training types resulted in improved writing amplitudes for the trained and untrained sequences. In conclusion, these results suggest that the feedback pen is a valuable tool to implement writing training in a tailor-made fashion for people with PD. Future studies should include larger sample sizes and different subgroups of PD for long-term training with the feedback pen.


2005 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S94 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Herman ◽  
N. Giladi ◽  
S. Erlich ◽  
L. Gruendlinger ◽  
J.M. Hausdorff

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natália Mariana Silva Luna ◽  
Guilherme Carlos Brech ◽  
Alexandra Canonica ◽  
Rita de Cássia Ernandes ◽  
Danilo Sales Bocalini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document