Microvessel density correlates with lymph node metastasis, but not with prognosis, in human pancreatic cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-529
Author(s):  
C BENCKERT ◽  
A THELEN ◽  
G SCHUMACHER ◽  
J LANGREHR ◽  
P NEUHAUS ◽  
...  
Surgery Today ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Benckert ◽  
Armin Thelen ◽  
Thorsten Cramer ◽  
Wilko Weichert ◽  
Gereon Gaebelein ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yoonhyeong Byun ◽  
Kyoung‐Bun Lee ◽  
Jin‐Young Jang ◽  
Youngmin Han ◽  
Yoo Jin Choi ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Ozaki ◽  
Takehisa Hiraoka ◽  
Ryuji Mizumoto ◽  
Seiki Matsuno ◽  
Yoshiro Matsumoto ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 4327-4333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonari Cho ◽  
Eisuke Shiozawa ◽  
Fumihiko Urushibara ◽  
Nana Arai ◽  
Toshitaka Funaki ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Tadafumi Asaoka ◽  
Atsushi Miyamoto ◽  
Sakae Maeda ◽  
Naoki Hama ◽  
Masanori Tsujie ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (7) ◽  
pp. 1614-1621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yazhou Cui ◽  
Jianmei Wu ◽  
Meijuan Zong ◽  
Guanhua Song ◽  
Qing Jia ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10053-10053
Author(s):  
S. Loges ◽  
H. Claussen ◽  
U. Reichelt ◽  
M. Bubenheim ◽  
A. Erbersdobler ◽  
...  

10053 Background: Neoangiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis represent prognostic factors in human malignancies. Determination of microvessel density (MVD) by immunohistology is labor-intensive and subject to interobserver variability. We evaluated real time PCR to quantify MVD in primary tumor samples from patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: We performed real-time PCR analyzes of endothel-specific (VE-Cadherin, P1H12, VEGFR-2, tie-2), lymphendothel-specific (Prox, LYVE, VEGFR-3) antigens and of angiogenic growth factors (VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, Ang-1, Ang-2) in primary esophageal carcinoma tissue of 54 patients. These results were compared to MVD determined immunohistochemically by CD31 staining. Results: For validation, MNC samples spiked with HUVECs were analyzed by qPCR for VE-CAD and P1H12 yielding a linear correlation (r=0.99 and 0.96 respectively). Expression of endothelial markers was highly correlated in tumor samples, e.g. CD144 with CD146 τb=0.451, CD144 with VEGFR-2 τb =0.744 and CD144 with tie-2 τb=0.684 (p for all comparisons < 0.0001). QPCR results were compared to MVD determination by CD31 staining in a subgroup of 33 patients. The highest association between both methods was found for CD144 (τb=0.258, p=0.0379) and VEGFR-2 (τb=0.222, p=0.0745) indicating that immunohistology and qPCR yield comparable results. MVD was significantly linked to the expression of VEGF-A, -C,-D and Ang1 and Ang2 (p for all comparisons <0.0001). We analyzed expression of lymphendothelial cell antigens Prox, LYVE and VEGFR-3 for quantification of lymphatic vessels. A close association between the expression of different lymphendothelial factors was seen (LYVE with Prox τb=0.334, p=0.0021, LYVE with VEGFR-3 τb=0.450, p=0.0150). MVD and lymphvessel density was not linked. Lymph node metastases detected on surgical specimen were associated with MVD determined immunohistologically (p=0.003)or by qPCR (p=0.048) and to VEGF-C expression (p=0.04). Conclusions: QPCR analysis of CD144 and VEGFR2 represents a novel tool for quantification of MVD in tumor samples. Expression of VEGFR2 and VEGF-C is associated with lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document