Strategic reasoning in persuasion games: An experiment

These three books cover the gamut of argument about deterrence, ranging from its politics to its theoretical status and its morality. The authors, while diverse in their professional status, being government 'experts', lawyers, theologians, political scientists and philosophers, all have this in common: they seek to tell us what to do. They attempt to relate theory to practice either to justify instrumental means or goals or to prescribe them. In this sense they are all contributors to the field of strategic reasoning.

Download Full-text

The role of hindsight in foresight: refining strategic reasoning

Futures ◽

10.1016/s0016-3287(03)00147-2 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 36 (2) ◽

pp. 161-179 ◽

Cited By ~ 46

Author(s):

R.Bradley MacKay ◽

Peter McKiernan

Keyword(s):

Strategic Reasoning

Download Full-text

Strategic reasoning about business models: a conceptual modeling approach

Information Systems and e-Business Management ◽

10.1007/s10257-008-0079-z ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 171-198 ◽

Cited By ~ 39

Author(s):

Reza Samavi ◽

Eric Yu ◽

Thodoros Topaloglou

Keyword(s):

Business Models ◽

Conceptual Modeling ◽

Strategic Reasoning ◽

Modeling Approach

Download Full-text

Towards a Logic for Conditional Local Strategic Reasoning

Logic, Rationality, and Interaction - Lecture Notes in Computer Science ◽

10.1007/978-3-662-60292-8_9 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 112-125

Author(s):

Valentin Goranko ◽

Fengkui Ju

Keyword(s):

Strategic Reasoning

Download Full-text

COMMUTER BRIDGE

Simulation & Gaming ◽

10.1177/1046878116671755 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 48 (1) ◽

pp. 153-169 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Ugo Merlone ◽

Angelo Romano

Keyword(s):

Social Dilemmas ◽

Social Dilemma ◽

Individual Rationality ◽

Second Phase ◽

Strategic Reasoning ◽

Two Phases

Background. COMMUTER BRIDGE is a n-person social dilemma game that allows participants to experience situations in which individual rationality leads to collective disaster. Aim. Participants are asked to imagine they are commuters who must every day reach a place in the shortest possible time. Method. The game is divided in two phases: in the first phase, participants can choose between two routes whereas in the second phase they are given a third possibility by the construction of a bridge that, paradoxically, increases traffic. Results and conclusion. Participating in this activity will enhance understanding of social dilemmas, help discover the limitations of communications, and develop insights about personal fallacies in strategic reasoning.

Download Full-text