Tu1096 RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING FORK-TIP CORE BIOPSY AND STANDARD ASPIRATION NEEDLES FOR EUS-GUIDED TISSUE ACQUISITION OF PANCREATIC MASSES

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. AB554
Author(s):  
Linda S. Lee ◽  
Neil R. Sharma ◽  
Jose Nieto ◽  
Shivani Mehta
PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e0154401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Woo Park ◽  
Moon Jae Chung ◽  
Sang Hoon Lee ◽  
Hee Seung Lee ◽  
Hyun Jik Lee ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 3777-3782
Author(s):  
Min Jae Yang ◽  
Jae Chul Hwang ◽  
Byung Moo Yoo ◽  
Jin Hong Kim ◽  
Dakeun Lee ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Ryo Igarashi ◽  
Atsushi Irisawa ◽  
Manoop S. Bhutani ◽  
Irina M. Cazacu ◽  
Goro Shibukawa ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives. Recently, a 21G Menghini-type needle for EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) has been developed. The stylet of the EUS Sonopsy CY™ remains inside the needle during aspiration. Therefore, it is expected to obtain higher-quality histological core specimens without crushing the material or blood contamination. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNAB of solid pancreatic masses with this new biopsy needle. Methods. A total of 30 patients with solid pancreatic masses who underwent EUS-FNAB with two different types of needles, EUS Sonopsy™ and ProCore™, were included in a prospective, randomized, controlled, crossover study. All the pancreatic masses were punctured with the two needles and were randomized regarding the order of the needle to be used. The primary outcome was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and the rates of tissue acquisition of the two needles. Results. The tissue acquisition rate was not significantly different between the EUS Sonopsy CY™ needle and the ProCore™ needle (78.6% vs. 82.1%, P=1.00). The histological diagnostic accuracy was also similar between the two needles (73% vs. 80%, P=.63). There was also no difference regarding the accuracy of cytology alone and the combination of both histological and cytological assessments between the EUS Sonopsy CY™ needle and the ProCore™ needle (90% vs. 87%, P=1.00 and 90% vs. 90%, P=1.00, respectively). Conclusions. EUS Sonopsy CY™ is a reliable device for EUS-FNAB of solid pancreatic masses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (10) ◽  
pp. E1315-E1320
Author(s):  
Benedetto Mangiavillano ◽  
Leonardo Sosa-Valencia ◽  
Pierre Deprez ◽  
Pierre Eisendrath ◽  
Carlos Robles-Medranda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Pancreatic cancer represents the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in Western countries and the need of a low-risk investigation to obtain an accurate histopathological diagnosis has become increasingly pressing. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the standard method for obtaining samples from pancreatic masses. In recent years, there has been an increasing need to obtain histological specimens during EUS procedures, rather than cytological ones, to guide oncological treatment options, leading to the so-call “FNB concept.” Different needles have been developed for fine-needle biopsy (FNB) in recent years, enabling acquisition of larger specimens on which to perform histological and molecular analyses. The aim of this narrative review was to assess the role of EUS-guided FNA and FNB in patients with pancreatic masses, and to identify which needle and which acquisition technique should be used to improve tissue acquisition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document