scholarly journals Primary precut sphincterotomy to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayur Gattani ◽  
Vikas Pandey ◽  
Shamshersingh Chauhan ◽  
Gaurav Singh
2010 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. S169-S170
Author(s):  
A. Mariani ◽  
A. Giussani ◽  
C. Vailati ◽  
M. Di Leo ◽  
S. Testoni ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. flgastro-2019-101380
Author(s):  
Jared Rejeski ◽  
Marc Hines ◽  
Jason Jones ◽  
Jason Conway ◽  
Girish Mishra ◽  
...  

GoalsOur study aims to define success and complication rates of precut sphincterotomy with the needle-knife and transpancreatic papillary septotomy (TPS) techniques as experienced at a single, high-volume endoscopy centre.BackgroundComplication rates rise with increasing number of failed attempts at biliary cannulation; therefore, early precut sphincterotomy (PS) has been recommended. Selecting the ideal method for PS can be challenging and there is a paucity of data to help guide this decision.StudyWe performed a retrospective analysis over 37 months of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) experience at a single institution. We identified all ERCPs performed and stratified based on the presence of PS; if PS occurred, a thorough chart review was performed to identify success and complication rates. Patients received guideline-driven management for post-ERCP pancreatitis including rectal indomethacin and pancreatic duct stenting when appropriate.ResultsWe identified 1808 ERCP procedures performed during this time. Successful biliary cannulation was achieved in 1748 cases, yielding a success rate of 96.7% (Grades I–IV ERCP difficulty/complexity). PS was required in 232 cases (12.8%); we identified 88 TPS cases and 114 needle-knife precut sphincterotomy (NKPS) cases. Complications following PS procedures occurred in 9.1% of TPS patients and 11.4% of NKPS patients. Success rates for TPS and NKPS were 97.7% and 81.6%, respectively—a statistically significant difference (p<0.001).ConclusionThis data supports TPS as a safe and effective option for biliary access in difficult cannulation settings when performed by experienced advanced endoscopists.


Endoscopy ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (06) ◽  
pp. 513-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Akaraviputh ◽  
V. Lohsiriwat ◽  
J. Swangsri ◽  
A. Methasate ◽  
S. Leelakusolvong ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. E3-E8
Author(s):  
Kazumasa Nagai ◽  
Akio Katanuma ◽  
Kuniyuki Takahashi ◽  
Kei Yane ◽  
Toshifumi Kin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Failure to recognize the right direction and precise incision length during precutting has been reported. To address these concerns, we developed a marking method that places a marking on the cutting endpoint before starting precutting. This preliminary study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of precut sphincterotomy using our new marking method. Patients and methods Between April 2015 and May 2017, 21 patients from our tertiary referral center were included in this study. Precut sphincterotomy using our marking method was employed for difficult common bile duct cannulation cases. Before starting precutting, a marking was placed slightly before the upper margin of the bulge of the papilla in the 11- to 12-o’clock direction as a cutting endpoint by cauterization with a needle knife. Results Technical success was obtained in all 21 procedures. There were no post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications except for one mild case of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Conclusion Our new marking method before precutting enabled precise incision and quick bile duct cannulation without causing severe complications.


2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. AB419
Author(s):  
Irfan Koruk ◽  
Musa Aydinli ◽  
Cemil M. Savas ◽  
Mehmet Koruk

Endoscopy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (06) ◽  
pp. 530-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Mariani ◽  
Milena Di Leo ◽  
Nicola Giardullo ◽  
Antonella Giussani ◽  
Mario Marini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document