Comparison of non-invasive versus invasive monitoring for detection of heart transplant rejection and cardiac vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. S116
Author(s):  
E. Usta ◽  
C. Burgstahler ◽  
S. Schroeder ◽  
A. Kuettner ◽  
A.F. Kopp ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Dhruva Sharma ◽  
Ganapathy Subramaniam ◽  
Neha Sharma ◽  
Preksha Sharma ◽  
Pooja Sharma

Abstract Purpose Patients with end-stage heart failure who remain symptomatic even with exemplary medical and device therapy are treated with heart transplantation. Multitudes of endeavor have been contrived during the last decennium in the field of noninvasive tests to rule out heart transplant rejection (HTR). In spite of having supportive literature, noninvasive imaging techniques lack acceptable documentation of clinical robustness, and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) still remains the gold standard. The aim of this review is to shed light on the existing noninvasive radiological modalities to detect rejection among heart transplant recipients. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted for this review article on the basis of literature available including scientific databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, using keywords of “Heart transplantation,” “Acute allograft rejection,” “Arrhythmias,” “Echocardiography,” “Speckle tracking echocardiography,” and “Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging” from inception until September 2020. Results After preliminary screening of the databases, details regarding existent noninvasive radiological modalities to detect HTR were gathered and compiled in this review article. Currently, deformation imaging using speckle tracking and T2 time using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can serve as screening tools based on which further invasive investigations can be planned. Standardization of blood-based and imaging modalities as screening and possible diagnostic tools for rejection would have obvious clinical and financial benefits in the care of growing number of post heart transplant recipients in our country. Conclusion Diagnosis of allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients through noninvasive techniques is demanding. To unravel the potential of noninvasive radiological modalities that can serve as a standard-of-care test, a prospective multicentric study randomizing noninvasive modality as first strategy versus current EMB-based gold standard of care is the need of the hour.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (45) ◽  
pp. 3194-3202 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-P. Duong Van Huyen ◽  
M. Tible ◽  
A. Gay ◽  
R. Guillemain ◽  
O. Aubert ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. O. Shevchenko ◽  
I. Yu. Tyunyaeva ◽  
A. A. Nasyrova ◽  
N. P. Mozheiko ◽  
S. V. Gautier

In cardiac recipients non-invasive monitoring will identify the risk of acute rejection, as well as reduce the number of routine biopsies. The relation between the development of the transplanted heart rejection and the change of elastic properties of common carotid artery has been proved. Aim: to analyze dynamics of iRIG in treatment of graft rejection in heart recipients.Materials and methods. 59 heart recipients were examined: 21 patients (pts)without rejection, 20 pts – with rejection after 1st biopsy, 15 pts – with rejection after 1st and 2 biopsies, 3 pts – with persistent rejection after all biopsies. iRIG was estimated using empirical equation.Results. Dynamics of iRIG in pts. without rejection according to all biopsies over time was not signifi cantly changed 6280 ± 2143, 6083 ± 2388, 6362 ± 1984 and 6188 ± 3012 cm/sec2 (p = 0.11, p = 0.13, p = 0.17 between the 1st and 2nd, 2nd and 3rd, 3rd and 4th values, respectively). In pts. with rejection iRIG decreased during treatment, but was signifi cantly higher even after successful treatment. In patients with persistent rejection iRIG did not decrease and tended to increase (17 459 ± 9702 cm/sec2 on the results of the 1st biopsy to 21 305 ± 10 448 cm/sec2 on the results of the 4th biopsy).Conclusions. In patients with heart transplant iRIG does not change signifi cantly with the time after transplantation. iRIG increases in all types of rejection, followed by its decrease in the course of therapy; in patients with persistent rejection iRIG remains high. Evaluation of iRIG can be used for non-invasive monitoring of patients after heart transplantations (HTx) and to identify patients at high risk of transplant rejection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. S218-S219
Author(s):  
S. Slomovich ◽  
Z.B. Roth ◽  
K.J. Clerkin ◽  
M. Habal ◽  
J.M. Griffin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. S84-S85 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. De Vlaminck ◽  
H.A. Valantine ◽  
H. Luikart ◽  
D. Weisshaar ◽  
D. Bernstein ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Ping Sun ◽  
Ibrahim A. Abdalla ◽  
Craig R. Asher ◽  
Neil L. Greenberg ◽  
Zoran B. Popović ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document