42 Predictors of Hospital Length of Stay Following Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis of the INTERMACS Registry

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. S23
Author(s):  
W.G. Cotts ◽  
K.L. Grady ◽  
E. McGee ◽  
D.C. Naftel ◽  
J.B. Young ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Ueyama ◽  
Aaqib H Malik ◽  
Toshiki Kuno ◽  
Yujiro Yokoyama ◽  
Suchith Shetty ◽  
...  

Introduction: Previous studies of patients undergoing various cardiac surgeries demonstrated worse outcomes among African American (AA) patients. It remains unclear if race is a predictor of outcomes among Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) recipients. Methods: Patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2017 were identified using the national inpatient sample (NIS). Race was classified as Caucasians vs. AA vs. Hispanics, and endpoints were in-hospital outcomes, length of stay and cost. Procedure-related complications were identified via ICD-9 and ICD-10 coding and analysis was performed via mixed effect models. Results: A total of 27,132 adults (5,114 unweighted) underwent LVAD implantation in the U.S. between 2010 and 2017, including Caucasians (63.8%), AA (23.8%) and Hispanics (6%). The number of LVAD implantations increased in both Caucasians and AA during the study period. AA LVAD recipients were younger, with higher rates of females and most of the comorbidities, but lower rates of coronary artery disease and coronary artery bypass grafting compared to Caucasians and Hispanics. Medicaid and median income at the lowest quartile were more frequent among AA LVAD recipients. We did not identify differences in in-hospital mortality, stroke, bleeding complications, infectious complications, and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis among racial groups (Table). AA LVAD recipients had lower rates of routine discharge than Caucasians and Hispanics, longer length of stay than Caucasians but similar cost of hospitalization. After adjustment with age gender and clinical comorbidities, race was not a predictor of in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: We identified differences in clinical characteristics but not in in-hospital complications among LVAD recipients of different race.


Author(s):  
Brian Ayers ◽  
Fabio Sagebin ◽  
Katherine Wood ◽  
Bryan Barrus ◽  
Sabu Thomas ◽  
...  

Objective Early reports of less invasive techniques for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation have demonstrated promising results. We sought to investigate the safety and feasibility of implementing the complete sternal-sparing (CSS) approach for LVAD implantation in patients with a history of prior cardiac operation. Methods This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for all patients implanted with a fully magnetically levitated LVAD from April 2017 through December 2018. Patients were dichotomized based on surgical approach: CSS or full median sternotomy (FS). Perioperative complications and overall survival were compared between cohorts. Results Of the 29 eligible patients, 15 (52%) were implanted via the CSS approach and 14 (48%) via FS. Preoperative characteristics were similar between cohorts. Overall survival to discharge was 93% for CSS compared to 71% for FS ( P = 0.169). The CSS cohort demonstrated fewer postoperative complications, including fewer cases of severe right ventricular failure ( P = 0.006) and less blood product utilization ( P = 0.015). Median hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for the CSS cohort (median 13 vs 32.5 days, P = 0.016). Neither cohort had any 30-day readmissions. Conclusions Early data suggest that the CSS technique is a safe and effective technique for patients with a history of prior sternotomy. Further studies are needed to validate this single-center experience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document