scholarly journals Expanded olfactometer for measuring reaction time to a target odor during background odor presentation

Heliyon ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e01254
Author(s):  
Naomi Gotow ◽  
Ayaka Hoshi ◽  
Tatsu Kobayakawa
1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryl A. Crabtree ◽  
Laura R. Antrim

Although reaction time is one of the most common measures of neurological function, protocols often do not take into consideration many of the extraneous factors that may invalidate such assessments. This paper discusses several issues related to matters of instrumentation, subject control, design of assessment, and interpretation. Twenty recommendations are provided as a guideline for those who assess reaction time of clients or patients. While these suggestions are not proposed as definitive or complete, the points should serve as a guide to young researchers as well as a checklist for more seasoned experimenters.


Author(s):  
Royal H. Burpee ◽  
Wellington Stroll

1985 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 314-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Willey

Author(s):  
Burcu Cinaz ◽  
Christian Vogt ◽  
Bert Arnrich ◽  
Gerhard Tröster

1979 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 589-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Owings ◽  
Clifford H. Fiedler

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen N. White ◽  
Katherine B. Gunter ◽  
Christine M. Snow ◽  
Wilson C. Hayes

The Quick Step measures reaction time and lateral stepping velocity. Upon a visual cue, participants step to the side as quickly as possible. Instrumentation includes floor pads with pressure-sensitive switches and two timers. In all, 109 older adults who had experienced a recent fall, 46 older adult nonfallers, and 24 young adults volunteered for testing. Reliability for reaction time and stepping velocity was good to excellent (intraclass correlation = 0.69–0.85). Multivariate analysis of variance revealed a significant difference between groups, p < 0.01, but not between stepping directions, p = 0.62–0.72, for both reaction time and stepping velocity. Reaction times were different among the three groups, p < 0.01, with the young adults having the fastest times and the older adult fallers having the slowest times. Lateral stepping velocity was faster among the young adults than for the two older groups, p < 0.01, but did not differ between the older adults, p = 0.29. It is concluded that the Quick Step is a simple and reliable tool for determining reaction time and lateral stepping velocity, and that this test can be used to detect a significant difference in reaction time between older adult fallers and nonfallers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document