Cost–Utility Analysis of Home-Based Tele–Rehabilitation Compared with Centre-Based Programme in Patients with Heart Failure

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. S45 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Hwang ◽  
J. Bruning ◽  
N. Morris ◽  
A. Mandrusiak ◽  
T. Russell
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1795-1803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Hwang ◽  
Norman R. Morris ◽  
Allison Mandrusiak ◽  
Jared Bruning ◽  
Robyn Peters ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A654
Author(s):  
P Stafylas ◽  
D Farmakis ◽  
G Kourlaba ◽  
G Giamouzis ◽  
M Chatzikou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mégane Caillon ◽  
Rémi Sabatier ◽  
Damien Legallois ◽  
Laurène Courouve ◽  
Valérie Donio ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Certain telemedicine programmes for heart failure (HF) have been shown to reduce all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalisations, but their cost-effectiveness remains controversial. The SCAD programme is a home-based interactive telemonitoring service for HF, which is one of the longest-running and largest telemonitoring programmes for HF in France. The objective of this cost-utility analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the SCAD programme with respect to standard hospital-based care in patients with HF. Methods A Markov model simulating hospitalisations and mortality in patients with HF was constructed to estimate outcomes and costs. The model included six distinct health states (three ‘not hospitalised’ states, two ‘hospitalisation for heart failure’ states, both depending on the number of previous hospitalisations, and one death state. The model lifetime in the base case was ten years. Model inputs were based on published literature. Outputs (costs and QALYs) were compared between SCAD participants and standard care. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty in the input parameters of the model. Results The number of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was 3.75 in the standard care setting and 4.41 in the SCAD setting. This corresponds to a gain in QALYs provided by the SCAD programme of 0.65 over the ten-year lifetime of the model. The estimated total cost was €30,932 in the standard care setting and €35,177 in the SCAD setting, with an incremental cost of €4,245. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the SCAD programme over standard care was estimated at €4,579/QALY. In the deterministic sensitivity analysis, the variables that had the most impact on the ICER were HF management costs. The likelihood of the SCAD programme being considered cost-effective was 90% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €11,800. Conclusions Enrolment of patients into the SCAD programme is highly cost-effective. Extension of the programme to other hospitals and more patients would have a limited budget impact but provide important clinical benefits. This finding should also be taken into account in new public health policies aimed at encouraging a shift from inpatient to ambulatory care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document