scholarly journals B-PO04-211 ADEQUATE CARDIAC SYNCHRONIZATION DELIVERED BY CONDUCTION SYSTEM PACING FOR A PATIENT WITH LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S365
Author(s):  
Weijian Huang ◽  
Songjie Wang ◽  
Rujie Zheng ◽  
Shengjie Wu
Circulation ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID S. CANNOM ◽  
BRUCE N. GOLDREYER ◽  
ANTHONY N. DAMATO

1970 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaya SUGIURA ◽  
Ryozo OKADA ◽  
Shinichiro OHKAWA ◽  
Hiroyuki SHIMADA

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roderick Tung ◽  
Gaurav A Upadhyay

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with improved outcome after cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). One historical presumption of LBBB has been that the underlying pathophysiology involved diffuse disease throughout the distal conduction system. The ability to normalize wide QRS patterns with His bundle pacing (HBP) has called this notion into question. The determination of LBBB pattern is conventionally made by assessment of surface 12-lead ECGs and can include patients with and without conduction block, as assessed by invasive electrophysiology study (EPS). During a novel extension of the classical EPS to involve left-sided recordings, we found that conduction block associated with the LBBB pattern is most often proximal, usually within the left-sided His fibres, and these patients are the most likely to demonstrate QRS correction with HBP for resynchronisation. Patients with intact Purkinje activation and intraventricular conduction delay are less likely to benefit from HBP. Future EPS are required to determine the impact of newer approaches to conduction system pacing, including intraseptal or left ventricular septal pacing. Left-sided EPS has the potential to refine patient selection in CRT trials and may be used to physiologically phenotype distinct conduction patterns beyond LBBB pattern.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 288-298
Author(s):  
Nadine Ali ◽  
Mathew Shun Shin ◽  
Zachary Whinnett

Abstract Purpose of Review The aim of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is to improve cardiac function by delivering more physiological cardiac activation to patients with heart failure and conduction abnormalities. Biventricular pacing (BVP) is the most commonly used method for delivering CRT; it has been shown in large randomized controlled trials to significantly improve morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. However, BVP delivers only modest reductions in ventricular activation time and is only beneficial in patients with prolonged QRS duration. In this review, we explore conduction system pacing as a method for delivering more effective ventricular resynchronization and to extend pacing therapy for heart failure to patients without left bundle branch block (LBBB). Recent Findings The aim of conduction system pacing is to provide physiological ventricular activation by directly stimulating the conduction system. Current modalities include His bundle and left conduction system pacing. His bundle pacing is the most established method; it has the potential to correct left bundle branch block and deliver more effective ventricular resynchronization than BVP. This translates into greater acute haemodynamic improvements and observational data suggests that His-CRT results in improvements in cardiac function and symptoms. AV-optimized His bundle pacing is being investigated in patients with heart failure and long PR interval without LBBB, to see if this improves exercise capacity. More recently, a technique for pacing the left bundle branch has been developed. Early studies show potential advantages including low and stable capture thresholds. Summary Conduction system pacing can deliver more effective ventricular resynchronization than BVP, which has the potential to deliver greater improvements in cardiac function. It may also provide the opportunity to extend pacing therapy for heart failure to patients who do not have LBBB. Further data is required from randomized trials to assess these promising pacing techniques.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1742-1745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amal Muthumala ◽  
Weijian Huang ◽  
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman

1970 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 627-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Cannom ◽  
Bruce N. Goldreyer ◽  
Anthony N. Damato

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document