scholarly journals Optimization of Parameters in the Hysteresis-based Steering Feel Model for Steer-by-Wire Systems**This research is principally funded by The European Union, Marie Curie Actions-Support for training and career development of researcher. [Project ID: PCIG09-GA-2011-294231 - SteeringFeelSBW]

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Kirli ◽  
M. Selçuk Arslan
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Ruiz-Eugenio

A literature review on integrative actions aimed at improving living conditions and access through education in areas such as health, employment and social and political participation among vulnerable groups is presented. Particularly, integrative actions targeted to teenage mothers, single families and Muslim women in the Scottish context. This review is part of the research results of Socio-educational action to Overcome poverty and inequalities (2012-2014) funded by Beatriu de Pinós plan for post-doctoral research of the Generalitat de Catalunya [The Governtmnet of Catalonia], co-funded in turn by the Marie Curie Actions of the 7th Framework Programme of Research of the European Union. The research project was developed at the Institute for Education, Community and Society at the University of Edinburgh.


eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G Pina ◽  
Ivan Buljan ◽  
Darko Hren ◽  
Ana Marušić

Most funding agencies rely on peer review to evaluate grant applications and proposals, but research into the use of this process by funding agencies has been limited. Here we explore if two changes to the organization of peer review for proposals submitted to various funding actions by the European Union has an influence on the outcome of the peer review process. Based on an analysis of more than 75,000 applications to three actions of the Marie Curie programme over a period of 12 years, we find that the changes – a reduction in the number of evaluation criteria used by reviewers and a move from in-person to virtual meetings – had little impact on the outcome of the peer review process. Our results indicate that other factors, such as the type of grant or area of research, have a larger impact on the outcome.


Author(s):  
Herman Lelieveldt ◽  
Sebastiaan Princen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document