Non-invasive plaque morphology-based FFR assessment: A new approach to predict ischemic coronary artery disease?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Tesche ◽  
Lauren Ellis ◽  
Verena Brandt
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Plaque Morphology ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Artery Disease

scholarly journals Vulnerable plaque imaging using 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1113) ◽  
pp. 20190797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Kwiecinski ◽  
Piotr J Slomka ◽  
Marc R Dweck ◽  
David E Newby ◽  
Daniel S Berman
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Sodium Fluoride ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Plaque Morphology ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Artery Disease

Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) has emerged as a promising non-invasive imaging modality to identify high-risk and ruptured atherosclerotic plaques. By visualizing microcalcification, 18F-NaF PET holds clinical promise in refining how we evaluate coronary artery disease, shifting our focus from assessing disease burden to atherosclerosis activity. In this review, we provide an overview of studies that have utilized 18F-NaF PET for imaging atherosclerosis. We discuss the associations between traditional coronary artery disease measures (risk factors) and 18F-NaF plaque activity. We also present the data on the histological validation as well as show how 18F-NaF uptake is associated with plaque morphology on intravascular and CT imaging. Finally, we discuss the technical challenges associated with 18F-NaF coronary PET highlighting recent advances in this area.

Rapid cardiac hybrid imaging with minimized radiation dose for accurate non-invasive assessment of ischemic coronary artery disease

2011 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard A. Herzog ◽  
Lars Husmann ◽  
Ronny R. Buechel ◽  
Aju P. Pazhenkottil ◽  
Irene A. Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Hybrid Imaging ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Cardiac Hybrid Imaging

Stress-induced Myocardial Ischaemia – Perfusion Contrast Echocardiography to Evaluate Presence and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Benoy Nalin Shah ◽  
Roxy Senior ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Contrast Echocardiography ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Suspected Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Ultrasound Contrast Agents ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Artery Disease

The development of stable transpulmonary ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) has allowed the echocardiographic assessment of myocardial perfusion, a technique known as myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). MCE exploits the ultrasonic properties of UCAs, which consist of acoustically active gas-filled microspheres. These are intravascular agents that have a rheology similar to red blood cells and thus allow analysis of myocardial blood flow both at rest and after stress. The combined assessment of wall motion and myocardial perfusion provides significant diagnostic and prognostic information during stress echocardiography. Functional imaging tests, such as myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, are also used for non-invasive assessment of coronary disease. The principal advantages of MCE are that it does not expose the patient to ionising radiation or radioactive pharmaceuticals, is not contraindicated in patients with an implanted metallic device or who suffer from claustrophobia and it can be performed at the bedside. The purpose of this article is to outline the physiological principles underpinning ischaemia testing with MCE before proceeding to review the evidence base for MCE in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

scholarly journals Screening for coronary artery disease in early surgical treatment of acute aortic valve infective endocarditis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiebe G Knol ◽  
Ali R Wahadat ◽  
Jolien W Roos-Hesselink ◽  
Nicolas M Van Mieghem ◽  
Wilco Tanis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Perioperative Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Estimated Risk ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract OBJECTIVES In patients with unknown coronary status undergoing surgery for acute infective endocarditis (IE), the need to screen for coronary artery disease (CAD) and the risk of embolization during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) are debated. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive alternative in these patients. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of ICA and CCTA to diagnose CAD, and the necessity to treat CAD to prevent CAD-related postoperative complications. METHODS In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, all patients with acute aortic IE between 2009 and 2019 undergoing surgery were selected. Outcomes were any clinically evident embolization after preoperative ICA, in-hospital mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction or unplanned revascularization and postoperative renal function. RESULTS Of the 159 included patients, CAD status was already known in 14. No preoperative diagnostics for CAD was done in 46/145, a CCTA was performed in 54/145 patients and an ICA in 52/145 patients. Significant CAD was found after CCTA in 22% and after ICA in 21% of patients. In 1 of the 52 (2%) patients undergoing preoperative ICA, a cerebral embolism occurred. The rate of perioperative myocardial infarction or unplanned revascularization in patients not screened for CAD was 2% (1 out of 46 patients). CONCLUSIONS Although the risk of embolism after preoperative ICA is low, it should be carefully weighed against the estimated risk of CAD-related perioperative complications. CCTA can serve as a gatekeeper for ICA in most patients with acute aortic IE.

scholarly journals Diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score of zero: is it time for guidelines to change?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Arbas Redondo ◽  
D Tebar Marquez ◽  
I.D Poveda Pinedo ◽  
R Dalmau Gonzalez-Gallarza ◽  
S.C Valbuena Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Coronary Artery Calcium ◽  
Cardiac Ct ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Agatston Score ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Introduction Cardiac computed tomography (CT) use has progressively increased as the preferred initial test to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD) when clinical likelihood is low. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) detected by CT is a well-established marker for cardiovascular risk. However, it is not recommended for diagnosis of obstructive CAD. Absence of CAC, defined as an Agatston score of zero, has been associated to good prognosis despite underestimation of non-calcified plaques. Purpose To evaluate whether zero CAC score could help ruling out obstructive CAD in a safely manner. Methods Observational study based on a prospective database of patients (pts) referred to cardiac CT between 2017 and 2019. Pts with an Agatston score of zero were selected. Results We included 176 pts with zero CAC score and non-invasive coronary angiography performed. The median duration of follow-up was 23.9 months. Baseline characteristics of the population are shown in Table 1. In 117 pts (66.5%), cardiac CT was indicated as part of their chest pain evaluation. Mean age was 57.2 years old, 68.2% were women and only and 9.4% were active smokers. Normal coronary arteries were found in 173 pts (98.3%). Obstructive CAD, defined as ≥50% luminal diameter stenosis of a major vessel, was present in 1/176 (0.6%); while non-obstructive atherosclerotic plaques were found in 2 pts (1.1%). During follow-up, one patient died of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. None either suffered from myocardial infarction or needed coronary revascularization. Conclusions In our cohort, a zero CAC score detected by cardiac CT rules out obstructive coronary artery disease in 98.3%, with only 1.7% of non-calcified atherosclerosis plaques and 0.6% of major adverse events. Although further research on this topic is needed, these results support the fact that non-invasive coronary angiography could be avoided in patients with low clinical likelihood of CAD and zero CAC score, facilitating the management of the increasing demand for coronary CT and reduction of radiation dose. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document