The diagnostic value of high-resolution ultrasonography for the detection of anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint: a meta-analysis employing the HSROC statistical model

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 852-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
X.Y. Dong ◽  
S. He ◽  
L. Zhu ◽  
T.Y. Dong ◽  
S.S. Pan ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Talmaceanu ◽  
Lavinia Manuela Lenghel ◽  
Nicolae Bolog ◽  
Roxana Popa Stanila ◽  
Smaranda Buduru ◽  
...  

Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of high-resolution ultrasonography (US) in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacements.Materials and methods: A number of 74 patients (148 TMJs) with signs and symptoms of TMJ disorders, according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders, were included in this study. All patients received US and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of both TMJs 1 to 5 days after the clinical examination. MRI examinations were performed using 1.5 T MRI equipment (Siemens Avanto, Siemens, Erlangen). Ultrasonographic examination was performed on a Hitachi EUB 8500 (Hitachi Medical Corp., Tokyo, Japan) scanner with L 54 M6.5-13 MHz linear transducer.Results: MRI depicted 68 (45.95%) normal joints, 47 (31.76%) with disc displacement with reduction, 33 (22.3%) with disc displacement without reduction and 34 (22.97%) with degenerative changes. US detected 78 (52.7%) normal joints, 37 (25%) with disc displacement with reduction, 33 (22.3%) with disc displacement without reduction and 21 (14.19%) with degenerative changes. Compared to MRI, US showed a sensitivity of 93.1%, specificity of 87.88%, accuracy of 90.32%, a positive predictive value of 87.1% and a negative predictive value of 93.55% for overall diagnosis of disc displacement. The Youden index was 0.81.Conclusions: Based on our results, high-resolution ultrasonography showed high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the diagnosis of TMJ disc displacement. It could be a valuable imaging technique in assessing TMJ disc position. The diagnostic value of high-resolution ultrasonography depends strictly on the examiner’s skills and on the equipment used. 


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurtulus Kaya ◽  
Deniz Dulgeroglu ◽  
Sibel Unsal-Delialioglu ◽  
Muzaffer Babadag ◽  
Tugra Tacal ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Abe ◽  
F. Kawano ◽  
K. Kohge ◽  
T. Kawaoka ◽  
K. Ueda ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ahmed Helal ◽  
Shoroog Hassan Agou ◽  
Amr Bayoumi ◽  
Ahmed Imam ◽  
Ali Habiballah Hassan

Objetive: This study was to compare the effectiveness of arthrocentesis versus the insertion of anterior repositioning splint (ARS) in improving the mandibular range of motion (MRM) for patients with the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDwR). Methods: 36 patients diagnosed as ADDwR were recruited and divided randomly into two groups. The first group (G1) was treated by arthrocentesis, and the second (G2) was treated using ARS. All patients were reexamined after six months. Results: Except that for protrusive movement, there were significant differences between the two groups for the percentage changes of the MRM as measured by the amount of pain free opening, unassisted opening, maximum assisted opening, right lateral and left lateral movements (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Within the context of the current study, the non-invasive, lower cost ARS, provided better results in improving the MRM when managing ADDwR cases.   Keywords Arthrocentesis; Anterior repositioning splint; TMD; Internal derangement; Anterior disc displacement; Mandibular range of motion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document