204 cases of lateral skull base tumors treated by maxillofacial surgeon: how we do it

Author(s):  
Y. Guo ◽  
C. Guo ◽  
D. Ma ◽  
G. Yu ◽  
M. Huang ◽  
...  
Head & Neck ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neila L. Kline ◽  
Kavita Bhatnagar ◽  
David J. Eisenman ◽  
Rodney J. Taylor

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Jian-feng ◽  
Zhang Qiu-hang ◽  
Yang Da-zhang ◽  
Qu Qiu-yi

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (Sup 1) ◽  
pp. S47
Author(s):  
John P. Leonetti ◽  
Doug Anderson ◽  
Sam Marzo ◽  
Guy Petruzelli ◽  
Darl Van Devender

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Leonetti ◽  
Sam Marzo ◽  
Neena Agarwal

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Perkins ◽  
Nathan Cass ◽  
Douglas J. Totten ◽  
David S. Haynes ◽  
Kareem O. Tawfik

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Kong ◽  
Hong-Yu Yang ◽  
Yu-Fan Wang ◽  
Hui-Jun Yang ◽  
Shi-Yue Shen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (04) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Demetri Arnaoutakis ◽  
Sameep Kadakia ◽  
Manoj Abraham ◽  
Thomas Lee ◽  
Yadranko Ducic

AbstractThe goals of reconstruction following any oncologic extirpation are preservation of function, restoration of cosmesis, and avoidance of morbidity. Anatomically, the lateral skull base is complex and conceptually intricate due to its three-dimensional morphology. The temporal bone articulates with five other cranial bones and forms many sutures and foramina through which pass critical neural and vascular structures. Remnant defects following resection of lateral skull base tumors are often not amenable to primary closure. As such, numerous techniques have been described for reconstruction including local rotational muscle flaps, pedicled flaps with skin paddle, or free tissue transfer. In this review, the advantages and disadvantages of each reconstructive method will be discussed as well as their potential complications.


2018 ◽  
Vol 80 (02) ◽  
pp. 125-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Juan ◽  
Gregory Basura

AbstractTinnitus, the phantom perception of sound in the absence of a physical sound source, is a complex problem with multiple etiologies. While most commonly presenting in a subjective fashion caused by measurable hearing loss, other etiologies including lateral skull base tumors that encroach on middle and inner ear structures can lead to phantom sound perception as well. In addition to discussing the basic background of tinnitus, here we also review current theories of etiology that include central auditory and nonauditory neural mechanisms and potential treatments that range from sound therapy to medications to cognitive and behavioral therapies and cranial nerve and brain stimulation. One main purpose of this article is to relate tinnitus causes to skull base tumors, surgical removal, and resultant sequelae, including damage to cranial nerves resulting in audiovestibular dysfunction. We also discuss the utility of microvascular decompression for both tumor and nontumor-associated tinnitus and the current literature regarding hearing preservation rates and tinnitus perception, where documented, with the three common treatment modalities employed for most lateral skull base tumors that includes watchful waiting with serial imaging, stereotactic radiosurgery and primary surgical resection using hearing preservation and hearing ablative approaches. The management of skull base tumors is a complex process that depending upon the approach and sequelae, may lead to manageable or worsening phantom sound perception that must be considered when discussing the multiple treatment options with patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document