Geometric Uncertainties in 3-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Author(s):  
Z. Jiang ◽  
G. Jiang ◽  
X. Shi ◽  
J. Zhu
2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Ishida ◽  
Katsuyuki Sakanaka ◽  
Kota Fujii ◽  
Satoshi Itasaka ◽  
Takashi Mizowaki

AbstractHypopharyngeal invasion would be a key finding in determining the extent of the irradiation fields in patients with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) omitting upper cervical lymph nodal irradiation in CESCC without hypopharyngeal invasion, and the dosimetric superiority of SIB-IMRT to 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). We retrospectively identified 21 CESCC patients without hypopharyngeal invasion [clinical Stage I/II/III/IV (M1LYM); 3/6/5/7] (UICC-TNM 7th edition) who underwent chemoradiotherapy using SIB-IMRT between 2009 and 2015. SIB-IMRT delivered 60 Gy to each primary tumor and the metastatic lymph nodes, and 48 Gy to elective lymph nodal regions, including Levels III and IV of the neck, supraclavicular, and upper mediastinal lymphatic regions, in 30 fractions. The overall survival rate, locoregional control rate, and initial recurrence site were evaluated. 3DCRT plans were created to perform dosimetric comparisons with SIB-IMRT. At a median follow-up of 64.5 months, the 5-year locoregional control and overall survival rates were 66.7% and 53.4%, respectively. Disease progressed in eight patients: all were locoregional progressions and no patients developed distant progression including upper cervical lymph nodal regions as initial recurrence sites. The planning study showed SIB-IMRT improved target coverage without compromising the dose to the organs at risk, compared with 3DCRT. In conclusion, omitting the elective nodal irradiation of the upper cervical lymph nodes was probably reasonable for CESCC patients without hypopharyngeal invasion. Locoregional progression remained the major progression site in this population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Agarwal ◽  
K. E. Hitchcock ◽  
C. G. Morris ◽  
T. J. George Jr ◽  
W. M. Mendenhall ◽  
...  

Purpose   We report our institution’s treatment techniques, disease outcomes, and complication rates after radiotherapy for the management of anal canal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (imrt) and concurrent chemotherapy relative to prior cases managed with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-crt).Methods   In a retrospective review of the medical records of 21 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven stage i (23%), stage ii (27%), or stage iii (50%) squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal treated with curative chemotherapy and imrt between July 2009 and December 2014, patient outcomes were determined. Results for patients treated with 3D-crt by the same group were previously reported. The median initial radiation dose to the pelvic and inguinal nodes at risk was 45 Gy (range: 36–50.4 Gy), and the median total dose, including local anal canal primary tumour boost, was 59.4 Gy (range: 41.4–61.2 Gy). Patients received those doses over a median of 32 fractions (range: 23–34 fractions). Chemotherapy consisted of 2 cycles of concurrent fluorouracil–cisplatin (45%) or fluorouracil–mitomycin C (55%).Results   Median follow-up was 3.1 years (range: 0.38–6.4 years). The mean includes a patient who died of septic shock at 38 days. The 3-year rates of overall survival, metastasis-free survival, locoregional control, and colostomy-freesurvival were 95%, 100%, 100%, and 100% respectively. No patients underwent abdominoperitoneal resection after chemoradiotherapy or required diverting colostomy during or after treatment. Those outcomes compare favourably with the previously published series that used 3D-crt with or without brachytherapy in treating anal canal cancers. Of the 21 patients in the present series, 10 (48%) experienced acute grade 3, 4, or 5 toxicities related to treatment.Conclusions   The recommended use of imrt with concurrent chemotherapy as an improvement over 3D-crt for management of anal canal carcinoma achieves a high probability of local control and colostomy-free survival without excessive risk for acute or late treatment-related toxicities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document