Intrafraction Esophageal Motion for Clinically T1 Esophageal Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. S332-S333
Author(s):  
S. Sekii ◽  
Y. Ito ◽  
K. Inaba ◽  
K. Kobayashi ◽  
K. Harada ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangjune Laurence Lee ◽  
Michael Bassetti ◽  
Gert J. Meijer ◽  
Stella Mook

In this review, we outline the potential benefits and the future role of MRI and MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) in the management of esophageal cancer. Although not currently used in most clinical practice settings, MRI is a useful non-invasive imaging modality that provides excellent soft tissue contrast and the ability to visualize cancer physiology. Chemoradiation therapy with or without surgery is essential for the management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. MRI can help stage esophageal cancer, delineate the gross tumor volume (GTV), and assess the response to chemoradiotherapy. Integrated MRgRT systems can help overcome the challenge of esophageal motion due to respiratory motion by using real-time imaging and tumor tracking with respiratory gating. With daily on-table MRI, shifts in tumor position and tumor regression can be taken into account for online-adaptation. The combination of accurate GTV visualization, respiratory gating, and online adaptive planning, allows for tighter treatment volumes and improved sparing of the surrounding normal organs. This could lead to a reduction in radiotherapy induced cardiac toxicity, pneumonitis and post-operative complications. Tumor physiology as seen on diffusion weighted imaging or dynamic contrast enhancement can help individualize treatments based on the response to chemoradiotherapy. Patients with a complete response on MRI can be considered for organ preservation while patients with no response can be offered an earlier resection. In patients with a partial response to chemoradiotherapy, areas of residual cancer can be targeted for dose escalation. The tighter and more accurate targeting enabled with MRgRT may enable hypofractionated treatment schedules.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 398-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhei Sekii ◽  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
Ken Harada ◽  
Mayuka Kitaguchi ◽  
Kana Takahashi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
J. Fukada ◽  
N. Shigematsu ◽  
T. Ohashi ◽  
T. Hanada ◽  
H. Takeuchi ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. e0198844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Doi ◽  
Yuji Murakami ◽  
Nobuki Imano ◽  
Yuki Takeuchi ◽  
Ippei Takahashi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
K. J. Maria Das ◽  
N. Aggarwal ◽  
S. Misra ◽  
S. Singh ◽  
S.K.S. Kumar

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (13) ◽  
pp. 169-176
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Evangelista ◽  
James L. Coyle

Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of death from cancer worldwide. Esophageal resection is the mainstay treatment for cancers of the esophagus. While curative, surgical resection may result in swallowing difficulties that require intervention from speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Minimally invasive surgical procedures for esophageal resection have aimed to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with more invasive techniques. Both intra-operative and post-operative complications, regardless of the surgical approach, can result in dysphagia. This article will review the epidemiological impact of esophageal cancers, operative complications resulting in dysphagia, and clinical assessment and management of dysphagia pertinent to esophageal resection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document