The First Prostate Specific Antigen Value after Androgen Deprivation Therapy Initiation and after Definitive Radiation Therapy Completion As a Biomarker For Disease Relapse and Mortality in Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer

Objective: To evaluate clinical predictors of lymph node invasion (LNI) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Methods: A contemporary cohort of 116 patients, who underwent ePLND during RP, was retrospectively evaluated. Patients were classified into 3 groups including cases without LNI (group 1), with 1 to 3 positive nodes (group 2; limited LNI), and with more than 3 positive nodes (group 3; extensive LNI). The multinomial logistic regression model (multivariate analysis) evaluated the risk of LNI. Results: Overall, 30 patients (25.9%) had LNI, which was limited in 17 cases (14.7%) and extensive in 13 subjects (11.2%). Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was higher in cases with limited (11.4 ng/mL) or extensive (23.5 ng/mL) LNI than cases without (7.3 ng/mL) and the difference was significant ( p <.0001). Median proportion of biopsy-positive cores was higher in limited (0.64) or extensive (0.54) LNI than cases without (0.34) and the difference was significant ( p < .0001). The distribution of other factors did not show any significant difference among the groups. On multivariate analysis, only higher values of PSA significantly affected the odds of extensive LNI when compared to cases without (odds ratio, 1.054; p = .005); PSA showed a fair discrimination power (area under the curve 0.792). Conclusion: PSA was the only independent predictor of extensive LNI and could be an important preoperative factor for stratifying high-risk patients.

Download Full-text

Propensity score matched analysis of metastasis-free survival for patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.47 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 47-47

Author(s):

Marshall Meeks ◽

Stephanie Subasic Markovina ◽

Joel Vetter ◽

Alethea Paradis ◽

Jeff M. Michalski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Radiation Therapy ◽

High Risk ◽

Radical Prostatectomy ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Specific Antigen ◽

Free Survival ◽

High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽

Risk Prostate Cancer

47 Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) category 1 recommendation for localized high risk prostate cancer (HR-PCa) is definitive radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Radical prostatectomy (RP) is also an accepted treatment for patients with localized HR-PCa. Here we report a propensity score-matched analysis of institutional outcomes for patients with HR-PCa treated with RP or RT. Methods: Medical recor ds of patients with localized NCCN HR-PCa treated at our institution from 2002-2011 were reviewed. RT consisted of 73.8-77.4 Gray to the prostate and seminal vesicles; regional lymph nodes were treated for pre-treatment probability of involvement ≥15%. A combination of nearest neighbor propensity score matching on age, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 score [a validated comorbidity index], prostate specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason, and clinical T-stage (cT) and exact matching on PSA, biopsy Gleason, and cT was performed. Multivariate cox-proportional hazards regression was used to compare metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) (calculated from date of diagnosis). Results: 246 patients were identified (160 RP and 86 RT). Propensity score matching resulted in 62 matched pairs. For the RP group, minimally invasive surgery (70.9%) and lymph node dissection (100%) were common. ADT was administered to 37.1% and 80.6% of patients receiving RP and RT, respectively. Median follow-up was longer for the RT group (51.4 vs 41 months, p = 0.004). Five-year rates of metastasis for RT and RP were 8.9% and 33% (p = 0.003), and for death were 25.9% and 17.6%, respectively (p = 0.31). MFS was significantly better for patients treated with definitive RT compared to RP, while OS was not different (Table). Conclusions: In our cohort with HR-PCa, treatment with RT resulted in a MFS advantage over RP. This was not accompanied by an improvement in OS.The difference in MFS may possibly be related to the importance of early adjuvant ADT. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text