The Injury Characteristics of Open Pilon Fractures Predictive of Complications

Injury ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob A. Heiner ◽  
Katherine A. Banner ◽  
Victor J. Wu ◽  
Timothy S. Achor ◽  
Joshua L. Gary ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 649-656
Author(s):  
Alkan Bayrak ◽  
Vedat Öztürk ◽  
Alican Koluman ◽  
Nezih Ziroğlu ◽  
Altuğ Duramaz

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S71-S72
Author(s):  
Erin Wolf Horrell ◽  
Ronnie Mubang ◽  
Sarah A Folliard ◽  
Robel Beyene ◽  
Stephen Gondek ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Burn morbidity and mortality increases with advancing age. Frailty is characterized by reduced homeostatic reserves and is associated with an increased biological age compared to chronological age. Our primary aim was to determine whether frailty as assessed on admission would be predictive of outcomes in the burn population. Methods We conducted a single institution 7-month retrospective chart review of all admitted acute burn patients ages 45 and older. Patient and injury characteristics were collected and compared using standard statistical analysis. Frailty scores were assessed upon admission using the FRAIL Scale. Results Eighty-five patients met inclusion criteria and were able to complete the FRAIL assessment. Patient and injury characteristics are listed in Table 1. Mean burn size was 6.7%TBSA (95%CI 4.9–8.4%). 34 patients (40%) were classified as robust (FRAIL score 0), 26(30.6%) as pre-frail (FRAIL score 1-Patients in the pre-frail/frail cohort received more palliative care consultations (p=.096) and had a longer length of stay (3.3d vs 7.55d p = .002), while prefrail patients had a similar LOS to frail patients (7.46 vs 7.64d p =.938). Patients in the pre-frail/frail cohort were also more likely to be discharged to a higher level of care than they were admitted from(p=.032) with prefrail patients experience an escalation in level of care more frequently than frail patients. The distribution by age by half-decade ranges is in Figure 1. By age 55–59, the majority of patients were prefrail or frail. Conclusions We demonstrated that frailty as assessed by the FRAIL score was predictive of increased length of stay and an escalation in post discharge care. In addition, patients characterized as pre-frail experience outcomes similar to frail patients and should be managed as such. Given the prevalence of frailty and prefrailty in the younger group of patients, we advocate for routine frailty screening beginning at age 55.


Author(s):  
Meredith Ehn ◽  
Masaru Teramoto ◽  
Daniel M. Cushman ◽  
Kristen Saad ◽  
Stuart Willick

Interscholastic youth cross-country mountain bike racing in the United States has grown significantly over the past decade, yet little is known about the risk profile in this age group. Aiming to protect participants, we implemented a prospective, longitudinal injury surveillance system for the purpose of better understanding youth mountain biking injuries and implementing safety measures. Data were collected during competition years 2018–2020, totaling 66,588 student athlete-years. Designated reporters from each team received weekly emails with exposure and incident report forms. Variables analyzed included demographic, rider-related, trail-related, and other data. Injury characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 were compared to the years 2018 and 2019. More student athletes participated in the 2020 season (25,261) than in prior seasons (18,575 in 2018 and 22,752 in 2019). During competition year 2020, overall injury proportion was lower (1.7% versus 3.0% in 2018 and 2.7% in 2019). Variables associated with injury, body part injured, type of injury, time-loss, and disposition following injury were similar between all years. Despite the pandemic and resultant changes to competition, student athletes continued to ride their bikes and become injured, but the proportion of injuries differed. This report details injury characteristics in youth mountain bike racing, including a comparison of before and during the pandemic.


2015 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S7-S13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar S. Molina ◽  
Daniel J. Stinner ◽  
Andrew R. Fras ◽  
Jason M. Evans

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianfeng He ◽  
Yong Hu ◽  
Penghan Ye ◽  
Lei Huang ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yohan Legallois ◽  
Fabien Baudelle ◽  
Pierre Lavignac ◽  
Matthieu Garcia ◽  
Pierre Meynard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document