Matching Candidates with Academic Teams: A Case for Academic Tenure

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-310
Author(s):  
J. Stephen Ferris ◽  
Michael McKee
1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-307
Author(s):  
geoffrey Caston
Keyword(s):  

1983 ◽  
Vol 4 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 163-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. McPherson ◽  
Gordon C. Winston
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Stuart J. Fowler ◽  
Sean Salter ◽  
Cayman Seagraves ◽  
Philip Seagraves

Author(s):  
Paige Clayton ◽  
Maryann Feldman

We review the literature on entrepreneurial team formation with a focus on data to study academic teams and summarize our empirical work on the life sciences industry. We consider how academics form teams to start new companies and the implications of various configurations on firm behavior with regards to patenting, survival and firm growth. We present several empirical challenges facing research on academic teams and conclude with suggestions for future research.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-356
Author(s):  
OLLE JANE Z. SAHLER

To the Editor.— In a recent issue of Pediatrics,1 the editors of several pediatric journals express disgruntlement with the practices of submitting articles reporting the same data to more than one journal, or "self-plagiarism," and of dividing studies into numerous short reports or "least publishable units." To combat these practices, they infarmally" inform one another about suspected duplication. All well and good, I suppose, and occasionally authors probably have had their hands slapped. But, the crux of the matter, really, is contained in paragraph 1, sentence 5: "We suspect that these practices are based on the desire to expand one's list of publications so as to enhance one's reputation and the chances of achieving promotion and academic tenure."


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document