The impact of SEC scrutiny on financial statement reporting of in-process research and development expense

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas D Dowdell ◽  
Eric Press
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Dickinson ◽  
Daniel D. Wangerin ◽  
John J. Wild

SYNOPSIS: Prior studies report a decline or no change in acquirers' profitability after a merger or business acquisition. Those studies, however, do not consider the downward impact on profitability that stems from use of the “purchase accounting” (and in later periods, “acquisition”) method for business combinations. Drawing on financial statement data from both targets and acquirers, we estimate the effects of the application of purchase/acquisition method accounting rules on post-acquisition profitability. We find that recognition rules for acquired inventories, deferred revenues, in-process research and development (IPR&D), and depreciation and amortization expense resulting from writing acquired assets up to fair value vis-á-vis purchase/acquisition accounting methods are all important sources of downward pressure in post-acquisition profitability. We find that investors and analysts appear to recognize the effects of IPR&D in assessing post-acquisition profitability of the combined entity. The findings also suggest that investors and analysts do not appear to fully incorporate the accounting effects related to inventories, deferred revenues, and depreciation and amortization expense for post-acquisition profitability. Data Availability: All data are publicly available from sources identified.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Chambers ◽  
Ross Jennings ◽  
Robert B. Thompson

This study investigates the extent to which potential financial reporting benefits from capitalizing and amortizing R&D costs depend on increasing the level of discretion permitted to financial statement preparers. To provide evidence on this issue, we examine the impact of alternative accounting schemes for R&D costs on the extent to which earnings and book values jointly explain the observed distribution of share prices. One alternative requires firms to capitalize and amortize R&D outlays, but provides them with no more discretion than that permitted under current rules. The other alternatives reflect increasing discretion over which R&D costs are recognized as assets and the periods over which these assets are amortized. We find that ability to explain the distribution of share prices increases with discretion, and conclude that substantial managerial discretion is likely to be a necessary (though not sufficient) ingredient of any alternative R&D accounting scheme that is capable of producing economically significant financial reporting benefits.


2016 ◽  
pp. 55-94
Author(s):  
Pier Luigi Marchini ◽  
Carlotta D'Este

The reporting of comprehensive income is becoming increasingly important. After the introduction of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) reporting, as required by the 2007 IAS 1-revised, the IASB is currently seeking inputs from investors on the usefulness of unrealized gains and losses and on the role of comprehensive income. This circumstance is of particular relevance in code law countries, as local pre-IFRS accounting models influence financial statement preparers and users. This study aims at investigating the role played by unrealized gains and losses reporting on users' decision process, by examining the impact of OCI on the Italian listed companies RoE ratio and by surveying a sample of financial analysts, also content analysing their formal reports. The results show that the reporting of comprehensive income does not affect the financial statement users' decision process, although it statistically affects Italian listed entities' performance.


Author(s):  
J.R. Caradus ◽  
D.A. Clark

The New Zealand dairy industry recognises that to remain competitive it must continue to invest in research and development. Outcomes from research have ensured year-round provision of low-cost feed from pasture while improving productivity. Some of these advances, discussed in this paper, include the use of white clover in pasture, understanding the impacts of grass endophyte, improved dairy cow nutrition, the use of alternative forage species and nitrogen fertiliser to improve productivity, demonstration of the impact of days-in-milk on profitability, and the use of feed budgeting and appropriate pasture management. Keywords: dairy, profitability, research and development


1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Storch ◽  
Donald Fraser ◽  
Robert Lunn ◽  
Barbara Glacel ◽  
Naomi J. McAfee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document