scholarly journals Treatment with desloratadine improves quality of life and symptom scores, including nasal congestion, in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis*1

2004 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. S27 ◽  
Author(s):  
A PRADALIER
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Symptom Scores

Montelukast Effectively Treats the Nighttime Impact of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 591-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli O. Meltzer ◽  
George Philip ◽  
Steven F. Weinstein ◽  
Craig F. LaForce ◽  
Marie-Pierre Malice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Global Evaluation ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Burden

Background Nighttime problems constitute a significant burden on the quality of life of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of montelukast on nighttime AR symptoms. Methods In seven multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trials, nighttime problems were assessed as the nighttime symptoms score (NSS), an average of three individual symptom scores: difficulty going to sleep, nighttime awakening, and nasal congestion on awakening (each rated 0 = none to 3 = severe). Patients (aged 15–82 years) were randomized to receive montelukast, 10 mg (n = 1751), placebo (n = 1557), or the positive control loratadine, 10 mg (n = 1616). Results In a combined analysis, changes from baseline (mean ± SE) in NSS were -0.28 ± 0.01, -0.16 ± 0.01, and —0.24 ± 0.01 for the montelukast, placebo, and loratadine groups, respectively. Difference versus placebo in least-squares mean change from baseline were —0.11 (95% confidence interval, -0.14, -0.08; p ≤ 0.001) for montelukast and -0.09 (-0.12, -0.06; p ≤ 0.001) for loratadine. Strong baseline correlations (R > 0.70; p < 0.001) of NSS and two of its individual symptoms with the sleep domain of the validated Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire support the validity and importance of measuring nighttime morbidity in SAR. Furthermore, a clinically important benefit of montelukast on the nighttime impact of SAR was shown using an analysis anchored on the Patient's Global Evaluation. Conclusion These data underscore the importance of nighttime problems in patients with SAR and the need to treat nighttime symptoms. In these studies, montelukast significantly improved the NSS, a clinically relevant and valid measure in patients with SAR.

Sleepiness, Quality of Life and Objective Sleep Patterns in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (03) ◽  
pp. 120-126
Author(s):  
Boris Stuck ◽  
Karl Hörmann ◽  
Joachim Maurer ◽  
Anna-Eva Hagner ◽  
Julia Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Sleep Patterns

Pharmacoeconomic features of the use of drugs used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Afanasyeva T.G. ◽  
Lavrova N.N. ◽  
Tumentseva V.R.
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Mucosa ◽  
Generic Drugs ◽  
Cost Minimization ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
World Health ◽  
Cost Minimization Analysis ◽  
Wide Range

Rhinitis is an inflammation of the nasal mucosa; today, according to the World Health Organization, the prevalence of the disease is 40% of the world's population. Allergic rhinitis is the most common type of chronic rhinitis, affecting 10–20% of the world's population, and the severity of the disease is associated with a significant deterioration in the quality of life, sleep and performance. Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa caused by exposure to an allergen, causing IgE-mediated inflammation. Clinically, the disease is characterized by the following main symptoms: rhinorrhea, sneezing, itching and nasal congestion. Despite the general symptoms of allergic rhinitis, its impact on the quality of life of patients and the significant cost of treatment, including pharmacotherapy, many patients do not adhere to drug treatment regimens due to their insufficient effectiveness in eliminating the emerging symptoms. Pharmacoeconomic research identifies, measures and compares the costs and effects of drug use. This framework includes research methods related to cost minimization, cost-effectiveness, decision analysis, cost of illness, and patient quality of life. This article will consider one of the four main methods for assessing pharmacoeconomics - cost minimization analysis. A cost-minimization analysis is a pharmacoeconomic assessment by comparing the costs of two or more drug alternatives regardless of outcome. Since the pharmaceutical market is represented by a wide range of original, reference and generic drugs for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, an important aspect of our research is the selection of effective and economically acceptable therapy for outpatients.

scholarly journals Evaluation of efficacy and safety of montelukast and levocetirizine FDC tablet compared to montelukast and levocetirizine tablet in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double blind, multicentre, phase III trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Sagar Panchal ◽  
Saiprasad Patil ◽  
Hanmant Barkate
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Global Evaluation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Nasal Symptoms

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> To evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of Montelukast 10 mg+levocetirizine 5 mg  FDC compared to either montelukast 10 mg or levocetirizine 5 mg given alone in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) patients.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double blind, parallel group, active controlled study was conducted in 279 SAR patients at 16 sites across India. Efficacy was assessed using daytime nasal symptoms score (Primary efficacy outcome), night-time symptoms score, daytime eye symptom score, patient's global evaluation, physician's global evaluation, rhino-conjunctivitis quality-of-life score.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> At end of treatment there was statistically significant evidence from the per protocol analysis that patients on FDC had a greater improvement in change from baseline in daytime nasal symptoms score than patients who received Montelukast (p=0.0266) or Levocetirizine (p=0.0409). These results were consistent with the Intent to treat analysis. Analysis of the secondary efficacy endpoints provided numerically greater improvement in the nighttime symptoms score, daytime eye symptoms score, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life scores in the FDC group as compared to the Montelukast group or Levocetirizine group. The FDC of Montelukast and Levocetirizine was found to be safe and generally well tolerated. The majority of adverse events were mild in severity, resolved without treatment and were unrelated to study medication.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Fixed dose combination of Montelukast and Levocetirizine was safe, generally well tolerated and superior on efficacy compared to Montelukast or Levocetirizine in patients of seasonal allergic rhinitis.</p>

scholarly journals Comparison of Budesonide Turbuhaler with Budesonide Aqua in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H Yang ◽  
Jerry Dolovich ◽  
Michel A Drouin ◽  
Paul Keith ◽  
Jennifer Haddon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Symptom ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Nasal Irritation ◽  
Eye Symptoms ◽  
Assess Quality ◽  
Substantial Control

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of budesonide Turbuhaler 400 µg/day with budesonide aqua 256 µg/day in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Secondarily to ascertain patients' preferences for the two nasal devices and to assess quality of life.DESIGN: Randomized, multicentre, double-blind, double- dummy, parallel groups study.SETTING: Private practices and hospital clinics in Ontario, Quebec and Manitoba.POPULATION: Two hundred and eighty-four out-patients with SAR, who were symptomatic during the ragweed season, volunteered for enrolment (243 randomized).RESULTS: Mean daily nasal symptom scores were significantly reduced with treatment. There were no statistically significant changes from baseline for eye symptoms. Most patients (more than 80%) achieved substantial control of their symptoms with budesonide. The most common nasal and non-nasal adverse events for both groups were epistaxis and headache. Turbuhaler was easier to use and more convenient to carry, had less of an unpleasant taste, and caused less nasal irritation than the aqua spray. More than twice as many patients preferred Turbuhaler to the aqua spray (69% versus 31%). Improvement in quality of life from baseline to clinic visits was statistically significant in both groups.CONCLUSION: Once daily use of 256 mg of budesonide aqua and 400 mg of budesonide Turbuhaler are equally safe and efficacious in the treatment of SAR. Patients preferred the budesonide powder formulation delivered via Turbuhaler two to one over the aqua formulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document