Bempedoic Acid Efficacy and Safety in High CVD Risk Patients Treated With or Without Ezetimibe: Pooled Analysis of 4 Phase 3 Clinical Trials†

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-570
Author(s):  
Alberico Catapano ◽  
Harold Bays ◽  
Maciej Banach ◽  
P. Duell ◽  
Ulrich Laufs ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1987
Author(s):  
Alberico L. Catapano ◽  
Harold Bays ◽  
Maciej Banach ◽  
P. Barton Duell ◽  
Ulrich Laufs ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Laufs ◽  
Maciej Banach ◽  
Harold E Bays ◽  
Alberico L Catapano ◽  
P Barton Duell ◽  
...  

Introduction: Some patients cannot tolerate statins mainly because of statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). Bempedoic acid (BA) is a prodrug activated in the liver and not in skeletal muscle. BA has been shown to significantly lower LDL-C by a mean of ~18% in patients receiving background maximally tolerated statins and a mean of ~25% in patients with statin intolerance. Objective: Determine efficacy and safety of BA in statin-intolerant patients receiving no background statin therapy across 4 phase 3 clinical trials. Methods: Data were pooled from 4 randomized (2:1), placebo-controlled studies evaluating oral BA 180 mg once daily vs placebo for 12 to 52 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoint was LDL-C % change from baseline to week 12. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESI), and laboratory values. For patients who reported SAMs, additional information around etiology and location were collected. Results: Of 3621 patients, 586 (394 BA; 192 placebo) reported intolerance to multiple statins because of SAMS or other AEs and received no statins during the studies. Mean baseline LDL-C was 148.7 mg/dL. After 12 weeks, BA significantly lowered LDL-C vs placebo (placebo-corrected, -26.5%; P < 0.001). Myalgia was the top reason for drug discontinuation, but was less common in the BA arm (17.7%) vs placebo (43.5%). CK > 5 х ULN was uncommon in both groups. Among AESIs (Table) , muscle disorders were reported by 12.7% (BA) vs 14.1% (placebo). Myalgia was less common with BA (4.6%) vs placebo (7.3%). Muscle spasms (4.1% vs 3.6%) and pain in extremity (3.3% vs 2.1%) were comparable between treatment groups. Muscular weakness was rare (0.5% BA, 1% placebo). Conclusion: Among the population of patients unable to use statins, BA significantly lowered LDL-C vs placebo without increasing muscle-related TEAEs. BA may be an appropriate lipid-lowering therapy for patients with hyperlipidemia who are statin intolerant.


Author(s):  
Alice B. Gottlieb ◽  
Jashin J. Wu ◽  
Christopher E. M. Griffiths ◽  
Kwaku Marfo ◽  
Elisa Muscianisi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1581-1589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annaswamy Raji ◽  
Jianmin Long ◽  
Raymond L. H. Lam ◽  
Edward A. O’Neill ◽  
Samuel S. Engel

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. s49
Author(s):  
Linda Stein Gold ◽  
Sunil Dhawan ◽  
Jonathan Weiss ◽  
Zoe D Draelos ◽  
Herman Ellman

Abstract Not Available


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document