Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A randomized clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 259 ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Lucia de Lima ◽  
Francisco Moisés Azevedo Braga ◽  
Rodrigo Maciel Medeiros da Costa ◽  
Elihab Pereira Gomes ◽  
André Russowsky Brunoni ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. e17-e18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Shiozawa ◽  
Andre Pereira G. Leiva ◽  
Claudia Dornfeld C. Castro ◽  
Mailu Enokibara da Silva ◽  
Quirino Cordeiro ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1335
Author(s):  
Rubén Arroyo-Fernández ◽  
Juan Avendaño-Coy ◽  
Rafael Velasco-Velasco ◽  
Rocío Palomo-Carrión ◽  
Elisabeth Bravo-Esteban ◽  
...  

Correct blinding is essential for preventing potential biases. The aim of this study was to assess the blinding of participants and a therapist following treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation in subjects with fibromyalgia using James’ and Bang’s blinding indexes. Eighty subjects were randomly allocated either active or sham stimulation groups in an intervention of five sessions lasting 20 min each. A questionnaire was delivered to both the therapist and patients after the last session to record their guess of which treatment had been applied. No differences between the groups were noted at baseline in terms of demographic or clinical data. James’ BI was 0.83 (CI 95%: 0.76–0.90) for the patients and 0.55 (CI 95%: 0.45–0.64) for the therapist. Bang’s BI for subjects was −0.08 (CI 95%: −0.24–0.09) and −0.8 (CI 95%: −0.26–0.1) for the active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation groups, respectively. Bang’s BI for the therapist was 0.21 (CI 95%: −0.02–0.43) and 0.13 (CI 95%: −0.09–0.35) for the active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation groups, respectively. Protocols of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation applied in this study have shown satisfactory blinding of the therapist and subjects with fibromyalgia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document