3-D reservoir characterization and hydrocarbon in-place volumetric estimation of parts of Niger Delta Basin-Nigeria

Author(s):  
Ebong D. Ebong ◽  
Anthony E. Akpan ◽  
Stephen E. Ekwok ◽  
Esu O. Esu ◽  
Loveth A. Ebong
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Okoli Austin ◽  
Onyekuru Samuel I. ◽  
Okechukwu Agbasi ◽  
Zaidoon Taha Abdulrazzaq

Considering the heterogeneity of the reservoir sands in the Niger Delta basin which are primary causes of low hydrocarbon recovery efficiency, poor sweep, early breakthrough and pockets of bypassed oil there arises a need for in-depth quantitative interpretation and more analysis to be done on seismic data to achieve a reliable reservoir characterization to improve recovery, plan future development wells within field and achieve deeper prospecting for depths not penetrated by the wells and areas far away from well locations. An effective tool towards de-risking prospects is seismic inversion which transforms a seismic reflection data to a quantitative rock-property description of a reservoir. The choice of model-based inversion in this study was due to well control, again considering the heterogeneity of the sands in the field. X-26, X-30, and X-32 were used to generate an initial impedance log which is used to update the estimated reflectivity from which we would obtain our inverted volumes. Acoustic impedance volumes were generated and observations made were consistent with depth trends established for the Niger Delta basin, inverted slices of Poisson impedances validated the expected responses considering the effect of compaction. This justifies the use of inversion method in further characterizing the plays identified in the region.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1087-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emele U. Okpogo ◽  
Chukwuemeka P. Abbey ◽  
Ifeyinwa O. Atueyi

Author(s):  
Ovie B. Ogbe ◽  
Anthony U. Okoro ◽  
Difference O. Ogagarue ◽  
Jerry Osokpor ◽  
Overare Brume ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 14-28
Author(s):  
Lawson Jack Osaki ◽  
Alexander Iheanyichukwu Opara ◽  
Chikwendu Njoku Okereke ◽  
Uche Petters Adiela ◽  
Ikechukwu Onyema Njoku ◽  
...  

3-D seismic interpretation and petrophysical analysis of the Osaja Field, Niger Delta, was carried out with aim of carrying out a detailed structural interpretation, reservoir characterization and volumetric estimation of the field. Four wells were correlated across the field to delineate the lithology and establish the continuity of reservoir sand as well as the general stratigraphy of the area. The petrophysical analysis carried out, revealed two sand units that are hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs (Sand_A and Sand_B).The spatial variation of the reservoirs were studied on a field wide scale using seismic interpretation. Time and depth structural maps generated were used to establish the structural architecture/geometry of the prospect area of the field. The depth structure map revealed NE-SW trending anticlinal structures with F5and F6as faults assisted closures to the reservoir. Furthermore, reservoir parameters such as net pay, water saturation porosity, net-to-gross etc, were derived from the integration of seismic and well log data. The structural interpretation on the 3-D seismic data of the study area revealed a total of seven faults ranging from synthetic to antithetic faults. The petrophysical analysis gave the porosity values of the reservoir Sand_A ranging from 18.1 - 20.3% and reservoir Sand_B ranging from 13.1-14.9% across the reservoir. The permeability values of reservoir Sand_A ranging from 63-540md and reservoir Sand_B ranging from 18-80md hence there is decrease in porosity and permeability of the field with depth.The net-to-gross varies from 22.1% to 22.4% in Rerservoir Sand A to between 5.34- 12% for Rerservoir Sand _A while Sw values for the reservoirs ranges from 38-42% in well 2 to about 68.79-96.06% in well 11. The result of original oil in place for all the wells calculated revealed that well 2 has the highest value with 9.3mmbls. These results indicate that the reservoirs under consideration have a poor to fair hydrocarbon (oil) prospect.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  

The reservoir characterization of Buma Field, Niger Delta using seismic and well log data is the focus of this research. Seismic data in SEG-Y format and suites of well logs have been used to achieve the aim and objectives of the research. Methodologies used in this work are standard methods used in this kind of research. Results of the analysis seismic data shows fifteen faults have been identified, nine trend NW-SE and are antithetic faults whereas the six trend NESW and are synthetic faults. These faults formed closures and could act as trapping mechanisms for hydrocarbon in the identified horizons/reservoirs. Two hydrocarbon bearing horizons D and F have been mapped on the seismic and analysis of the well logs showed that sand and shale are major lithologies in the studied wells. Well correlation showed similarities in geological properties such as lithology, reservoir tops and petrophysical properties. Volumetric estimation carried out on the two reservoirs showed Reservoir D having average thickness of 26.73 ft., area of 3784.89 acres, bulk volume of 4407x106 ft3 , net volume of 4226x106 ft3 , pore volume of 216 x106 RB, hydrocarbon pore volume (oil) of 143x106 RB and STOIIP of 77 MMSTB. Reservoir F has an average thickness of 41.55 ft., area of 2790.63 acres, bulk volume of 5051x106 ft3, net volume of 4769x10106 ft3 , pore volume of 248x10106 RB, hydrocarbon pore volume (oil) of 167x10106 RB and STOIIP of 88 MMSTB. Integrating results of structural interpretation, well log analysis, petrophysical properties and volumetric estimation it is evident that both reservoirs have very good porosities and excellent permeability, good thicknesses of productive sand and reduced water saturation as to aid storage and easy flow of hydrocarbon pore fluids. Therefore, the two Buma Field Reservoirs D and F are prolific with hydrocarbon pore fluids (oil) which can be exploited economically


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 601-610
Author(s):  
K. Itiowe ◽  
R. Oghonyon ◽  
B. K. Kurah

The sediment of #3 Well of the Greater Ughelli Depobelt are represented by sand and shale intercalation. In this study, lithofacies analysis and X-ray diffraction technique were used to characterize the sediments from the well. The lithofacies analysis was based on the physical properties of the sediments encountered from the ditch cuttings.  Five lithofacies types of mainly sandstone, clayey sandstone, shaly sandstone, sandy shale and shale and 53 lithofacies zones were identified from 15 ft to 11295 ft. The result of the X-ray diffraction analysis identified that the following clay minerals – kaolinite, illite/muscovite, sepiolite, chlorite, calcite, dolomite; with kaolinite in greater percentage. The non-clay minerals include quartz, pyrite, anatase, gypsum, plagioclase, microcline, jarosite, barite and fluorite; with quartz having the highest percentage. Therefore, due to the high percentage of kaolinite in #3 well, the pore filing kaolinite may have more effect on the reservoir quality than illite/muscovite, chlorite and sepiolite. By considering the physical properties, homogenous and heterogeneous nature of the #3 Well, it would be concluded that #3 Well has some prospect for petroleum and gas exploration.


Author(s):  
Joseph Nanaoweikule Eradiri ◽  
Ehimare Erhire Odafen ◽  
Ikenna Christopher Okwara ◽  
Ayonma Wilfred Mode ◽  
Okwudiri Aloysius Anyiam ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Ubong Essien ◽  
Akaninyene Akankpo ◽  
Okechukwu Agbasi

Petrophysical analysis was performed in two wells in the Niger Delta Region, Nigeria. This study is aimed at making available petrophysical data, basically water saturation calculation using cementation values of 2.0 for the reservoir formations of two wells in the Niger delta basin. A suite of geophysical open hole logs namely Gamma ray; Resistivity, Sonic, Caliper and Density were used to determine petrophysical parameters. The parameters determined are; volume of shale, porosity, water saturation, irreducible water saturation and bulk volume of water. The thickness of the reservoir varies between 127ft and 1620ft. Average porosity values vary between 0.061 and 0.600; generally decreasing with depth. The mean average computed values for the Petrophysical parameters for the reservoirs are: Bulk Volume of Water, 0.070 to 0.175; Apparent Water Resistivity, 0.239 to 7.969; Water Saturation, 0.229 to 0.749; Irreducible Water Saturation, 0.229 to 0.882 and Volume of Shale, 0.045 to 0.355. The findings will also enhance the proper characterization of the reservoir sands.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document