scholarly journals The Risk of Allergic Reaction to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and Recommended Evaluation and Management: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, GRADE Assessment, and International Consensus Approach

Author(s):  
Matthew Greenhawt ◽  
Elissa M. Abrams ◽  
Marcus Shaker ◽  
Derek K. Chu ◽  
David Kahn ◽  
...  



Author(s):  
Kiran Maski ◽  
Lynn Marie Trotti ◽  
Suresh Kotagal ◽  
Robert R Auger ◽  
James A Rowley ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Ponzano ◽  
Nicholas Tibert ◽  
Symron Bansal ◽  
Wendy Katzman ◽  
Lora Giangregorio




Author(s):  
JE Rod ◽  
Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios ◽  
Teresa Senserrick ◽  
Mark King




2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (07) ◽  
pp. 1209-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Smith ◽  
Christina S. McCrae ◽  
Joseph Cheung ◽  
Jennifer L. Martin ◽  
Christopher G. Harrod ◽  
...  


Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2235
Author(s):  
Laura Ruzzini ◽  
Sergio De De Salvatore ◽  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Martina Marino ◽  
Alessandra Greco ◽  
...  

The primary methods for prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot are ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An ultrasound is performed between the 1st trimester and the 28th week of pregnancy and it is reported to be used as a diagnostic method alone or in combination with MRI. So far, an international consensus on the most effective screening method has not been reached. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to establish the most effective and reliable exam for prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot. The literature search was conducted using a PIOS-approach from May 2021 to June 2021. Studies reporting cases of prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot made through US and MRI conducted from January 2010 to June 2021 were included in the study and reviewed by 2 authors. The 23 selected studies included 2318 patients. A total of 11 of the studies included details on the accuracy, while the rest were used to obtain information about the primary methodology utilized. In all the selected studies, US was used as the primary diagnostic instrument. Thirteen of the studies used the US exclusively, while three used MRI in addition to US and seven performed karyotyping after US diagnosis. The US has been shown to be the instrument of choice for the prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot. International guidelines for an ultrasonography classification of congenital clubfoot are required to reduce the inter-variability accuracy of this procedure.



2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Ponzano ◽  
Nicholas Tibert ◽  
Symron Bansal ◽  
Wendy Katzman ◽  
Lora Giangregorio


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document