scholarly journals A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Procedures Using Patient-Reported Outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 221 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliane Bingener ◽  
Pam Skaran ◽  
Andrea McConico ◽  
Paul Novotny ◽  
Peter Wettstein ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (06) ◽  
pp. 511-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsunori Yoshimoto ◽  
Noriyuki Iesato ◽  
Yoshinori Terashima ◽  
Tsuneo Takebayashi ◽  
Toshihiko Yamashita ◽  
...  

Study Design A retrospective comparative study. Objective To compare retrospectively the clinical results and surgical invasiveness of two different types of minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: microendoscopic muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (ME-MILD) and spinal process splitting laminectomy (SPSL). Summary of Background Data ME-MILD and SPSL are minimally invasive procedures. However, the two procedures have not been compared in the literature. Materials and Methods We retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent ME-MILD or SPSL from 2011 to 2015. The surgical invasiveness of each technique was determined by evaluating the time required for the surgical procedure, amount of blood loss, serum creatine kinase (CK) levels on postoperative day (POD) 1, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on POD 3 and 7, and the hospitalization. The clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire score, the Short Form (36) Health Survey patient-reported outcome score, the visual analog scale for pain, a patient satisfaction score, and the incidence of surgical complications. Results A total of 97 patients were evaluated: 58 patients underwent ME-MILD, and 39 patients underwent SPSL. No significant differences were observed in the clinical results between the two groups. Regarding surgical invasiveness, no significant difference was found in the amount of blood loss, levels of CK, hospitalization, or time required for the procedure. However, CRP levels were significantly lower in the ME-MILD group. Conclusions ME-MILD and SPSL are both minimally invasive procedures. In a comparison of these two procedures, CRP was significantly lower in the ME-MILD group.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Beutner ◽  
M. May ◽  
B. Hoschke ◽  
C. Helke ◽  
M. Lein ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1015-1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Frede ◽  
Ahmed Hammady ◽  
Jan Klein ◽  
Dogu Teber ◽  
Noriyuki Inaki ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly E. Diaz ◽  
Douglas Tremblay ◽  
Begum Ozturk ◽  
Ghideon Ezaz ◽  
Suzanne Arinsburg ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan W. Miller ◽  
Mindi S. Miller

Urinary incontinence (UI) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are 2 common urogenital problems in men. UI is associated with involuntary leakage of urine and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of urgency, frequency, and nocturia. Types of UI include functional, urge, stress, and overflow. Treatment for UI is based on the type of incontinence, patient-specific factors, and treatment preferences of both patients and health care providers. Options for the management of UI include environmental modifications, disposable incontinence products, pelvic floor exercises, pharmacotherapy, surgically implanted devices, and intermittent catheterization. BPH may be also associated with LUTS. Patient symptoms, assessed with a measurement tool such as the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI), serve as the basis for determining treatment. Management approaches for BPH include pharmacotherapy, surgery, and minimally invasive procedures. Anticholinergic drugs as well as α-receptor antagonists and 5-α reductase inhibitors, either alone or in combination, are effective and useful for LUTS unresponsive to traditional pharmacotherapy. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) can eliminate symptoms of BPH but is associated with relatively more complications than other available surgical and minimally invasive procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document