Impact of a Novel Component Separation Technique for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair on Practice Patterns and Patient Outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. e161
Author(s):  
John R. Montgomery ◽  
James Henderson ◽  
Justin B. Dimick ◽  
Dana A. Telem
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterini Christina Tampaki ◽  
Athanasios Tampakis ◽  
Konstantinos Kontzoglou ◽  
Gregory Kouraklis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3273
Author(s):  
Ravi Saroha ◽  
Shivani B. Paruthy ◽  
Sunil Singh

Background: In our tertiary care hospital, we receive a large number of acute abdomen cases. Raised intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) makes laparostomy mandatory initially and abdominal wall approximation cannot be completed due to compromised state in most cases. Large incisional hernias were seen on complete healing and this study was done to see the feasibility of component separation technique (CST) with mesh augmentation.Methods: 30 patients were subjected to CST with mesh augmentation. Preoperative defect size mapping, Pre- and post-operative monitoring of IAP were done. Pain scoring by visual analogue scale (VAS), early and late complications was noted. Patients were followed up for 60 months.Results: CST with mesh augmentation was found to be feasible with 96.77% success rate as no recurrence was noted in follow up. Preoperative average Basal metabolic index was 26.09. Size of defect varied from 17-20×9-16 cm2 (length X width). Seroma seen in 50% of patients was managed without any intervention. Skin necrosis in 6.6% and wound dehiscence in 3.33%, managed with minimal debridement & local wound care respectively. Respiratory compromise and hematoma were not seen and no patient required any active ICU care. Average length of hospital stay was 5.22 days. Close monitoring of IAP in immediate post-operative period was found to be significant.Conclusion: Physical acceptance of stable abdominal wall gives a psychological boost to patients with early recovery in form of ambulation and early return to work.


2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110475
Author(s):  
Tayler J James ◽  
Lauren Hawley ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
Evan T Alicuben ◽  
Kamran Samakar

Background Body mass index (BMI) thresholds are utilized as a preoperative optimization strategy for obese patients prior to elective abdominal wall hernia repair. The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of patients at our institution who ultimately underwent hernia repair after initial deferral due to BMI and to evaluate outcomes of those who required emergent repair during the deferral period. Methods A retrospective review was performed from 2016 to 2018 to identify all patients with abdominal wall hernias who were deferred surgery due to BMI. Patient characteristics, hernia type, change in BMI, progression to surgery, acuity of surgery (elective or emergent), and postoperative outcomes were examined. Results 200 patients were deferred hernia repair due to BMI. Of these, 150 (75%) did not undergo repair over a mean period of 27 months. The remaining 50 patients ultimately underwent repair, 36 of which (72%) were elective and 14 (28%) emergent. The mean initial BMI of the elective group was 35.3 ± 1.8, compared to 39.1 ± 5.3 in the no surgery group and 40.6 ± 8.2 in the emergent group ( P < .01). While the elective group lost weight before surgery, the other groups did not. Patients who required emergent surgery had worse outcomes than those repaired electively. Conclusions Preoperative weight loss is unsuccessful in most obese patients presenting for abdominal wall hernia repair at our institution. Patients who required emergent hernia repair had worse outcomes than those who underwent elective repair. Our institution’s BMI threshold is a failed optimization strategy that needs to be reconsidered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document