Female Sex Predicts In-Hospital Mortality after Endovascular Aortic Repair for Ruptured Aortic Aneurysm

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. S344-S345
Author(s):  
Vy T. Ho ◽  
Kara Rothenberg ◽  
Elizabeth George ◽  
Manuel Garcia-Toca ◽  
Jason T. Lee ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 815-818
Author(s):  
Jhonathan Uribe ◽  
Héctor Malváez ◽  
Silvestre Montoya ◽  
Joel Sánchez ◽  
Moisés Jiménez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-Lun Lai ◽  
Raymond Nien-Chen Kuo ◽  
Ting-Chuan Wang ◽  
K. Arnold Chan

Abstract Background Several studies have found a so-called weekend effect that patients admitted at the weekends had worse clinical outcomes than patients admitted at the weekdays. We performed this retrospective cohort study to explore the weekend effect in four major cardiovascular emergencies in Taiwan. Methods The Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database between 2005 and 2015 was used. We extracted 3811 incident cases of ruptured aortic aneurysm, 184,769 incident cases of acute myocardial infarction, 492,127 incident cases of ischemic stroke, and 15,033 incident cases of pulmonary embolism from 9,529,049 patients having at least one record of hospitalization in the NHI claims database within 2006 ~ 2014. Patients were classified as weekends or weekdays admission groups. Dates of in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality were obtained from the Taiwan National Death Registry. Results We found no difference in in-hospital mortality between weekend group and weekday group in patients with ruptured aortic aneurysm (45.4% vs 45.3%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–1.17, p = 0.93), patients with acute myocardial infarction (15.8% vs 16.2%, adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95–1.00, p = 0.10), patients with ischemic stroke (4.1% vs 4.2%, adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.03, p = 0.71), and patients with pulmonary embolism (14.6% vs 14.6%, adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92–1.15, p = 0.66). The results remained for 1 year in all the four major cardiovascular emergencies. Conclusions We found no difference in either short-term or long-term mortality between patients admitted on weekends and patients admitted on weekdays in four major cardiovascular emergencies in Taiwan.


2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. e25-e28
Author(s):  
German Fortunato ◽  
Guillermo Stöger ◽  
Ricardo Marenchino ◽  
Vadim Kotowicz

Background The authors present two cases with type B aortic dissection initially treated by endovascular stent graft who developed aortic complications posttreatment and required surgical treatment. Case Description A 50-year-old woman and a 65-year-old man underwent endovascular treatment for thoracic aortic aneurysm associated with type B dissection and —both of them evolved with endoleak type 1. The first case was related to aortobronchial fistula, and the second one was associated with ascending aortic aneurysm. An extra-anatomical ascending aorta-supraceliac aorta bypass grafting was decided due to the persistent leak. Conclusion Surgery is an excellent choice for complex complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair with previous failed attempts of endovascular resolution.


Author(s):  
Arzu Karaveli

Objective: Our study aimed to examine retrospectively the anesthesia techniques and their results applied to patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair due to aortic pathology. Methods: This retrospective and observational study included patients who underwent EVAR or TEVAR for abdominal and/or thoracic aortic aneurysm between 2015-2021. Patients’ demographic data, type of surgery and anesthesia, duration of surgery and anesthesia, amount of blood transfusion, lengths of stay in ICU and of hospital were recorded. Results: The data of 206 patients who underwent EVAR and TEVAR for abdominal and/or thoracic aortic aneurysm were obtained. TEVAR was applied to 63 patients and EVAR was applied to 143 patients. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia (GA) in all 63 patients who underwent TEVAR, while 15 patients who underwent EVAR were operated under GA and 128 patients under regional anesthesia (RA). The mean anesthesia and surgery times were found 136.1±72.0 min. and 112.2±71.3 min. in GA patients and it was 112.2±71.3 min. and 96.5±32.1 min. in RA patients. The mean length of ICU and hospital stays were determined as 1.6±2.1 days and 3.1±2.7 days in GA patients, and 1.2±0.6 days and 3.1±2.5 days in RA patients. Conclusion: GA or RA methods are preferred as anesthesia techniques in patients undergoing EVAR due to aortic aneurysm. Although RA has advantages compared to GA, such as shorting the lenght of hospital and ICU stays, reducing the blood product requirements, shorting both anesthesia and surgery times, patient characteristics should also be considered in the selection of anesthesia techniques.


ASVIDE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 334-334
Author(s):  
Derek Serna-Gallegos ◽  
Edgar Aranda-Michel ◽  
Forozan Navid ◽  
Ibrahim Sultan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document