scholarly journals Probability of Postoperative Complication After Liver Resection: Stratification of Patient Factor, Operative Complexity, and Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

Author(s):  
Kosuke Kobayashi ◽  
Yoshikuni Kawaguchi ◽  
Michael Schneider ◽  
Giulia Piazza ◽  
Ismail Labgaa ◽  
...  
HPB ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e539 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.C. Ariffin ◽  
A.W. Ahmad ◽  
Z. Zuhdi ◽  
I.S. Mohamad ◽  
A. Azman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiwei Shen ◽  
Feng Lv ◽  
Su Min ◽  
Gangming Wu ◽  
Juying Jin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to improve clinical outcomes after surgery. Considering the importance of patient experience for patients with benign surgery, this study evaluated whether improved compliance with ERAS protocol modified for gynecological surgery which recommended by the ERAS Society is associated with better clinical outcomes and patient experience, and to determine the influence of compliance with each ERAS element on patients’ outcome after benign hysterectomy. Methods A prospective observational study was performed on the women who underwent hysterectomy between 2019 and 2020. A total of 475 women greater 18 years old were classified into three groups according to their per cent compliance with ERAS protocols: Group I: < 60% (148 cases); Group II:≥60 and < 80% (160 cases); Group III: ≥80% (167 cases). Primary outcome was the 30-day postoperative complications. Second outcomes included QoR-15 questionnaire scores, patient satisfaction on a scale from 1 to 7, and length of stay after operation. After multivariable binary logistic regression analyse, a nomogram model was established to predict the incidence of having a postoperative complication with individual ERAS element compliance. Results The study enrolled 585 patients, and 475 completed the follow-up assessment. Patients with compliance over 80% had a significant reduction in postoperative complications (20.4% vs 41.2% vs 38.1%, P < 0.001) and length of stay after surgery (4 vs 5 vs 4, P < 0.001). Increased compliance was also associated with higher patient satisfaction and QoR-15 scores (P < 0.001),. Among the five dimensions of the QoR-15, physical comfort (P < 0.05), physical independence (P < 0.05), and pain dimension (P < 0.05) were better in the higher compliance groups. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (P < 0.001), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis (P < 0.001), early mobilization (P = 0.031), early oral nutrition (P = 0.012), and early removal of urinary drainage (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with less complications. Having a postoperative complication was better predicted by the proposed nomogram model with high AUC value (0.906) and sensitivity (0.948) in the cohort. Conclusions Improved compliance with the ERAS protocol was associated with improved recovery and better patient experience undergoing hysterectomy. MIS, PONV prophylaxis, early mobilization, early oral intake, and early removal of urinary drainage were of concern in reducing postoperative complications. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800019178. Registered on 30/10/2018.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varut Lohsiriwat ◽  
Romyen Jitmungngan ◽  
Weeraput Chadbunchachai ◽  
Patompong Ungprasert

Abstract Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves outcomes after elective colorectal operations. Whether it is beneficial for emergency colorectal surgery is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review and summarize evidence from all studies comparing ERAS versus conventional care in patients having emergency colectomy and/or proctectomy for obstructive colorectal cancer.Methods: EMBASE and MEDLINE from inception to October 2019 were systematically searched. Any studies comparing our primary outcome of interest (length of hospitalization) among patients having emergency resection for obstructive colorectal cancer who received ERAS versus conventional care were selected. Primary outcome was length of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal recovery, postoperative complication, 30-day readmission and mortality, and time to start adjuvant therapy.Results: Three cohort studies with 818 participants (418 received ERAS and 400 received conventional care) were included. Length of hospitalization (mean reduction 3.07 days; 95% CI, - 3.91 to -2.23) and risk of overall postoperative complication (risk ratio 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.97) were significantly lower in ERAS than in conventional care. ERAS was also associated with quicker time to gastrointestinal recovery, a lower incidence of ileus, and a shorter interval between operation and commence of adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the rates of anastomotic leakage, re-operation, readmission and mortality within 30 days after an operation between groups.Conclusions: ERAS had advantages over conventional care in patients undergoing emergency resection for obstructive colorectal cancer - including a shorter length of hospitalization, a lower incidence of complication and quicker gastrointestinal recovery.


2016 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. S962
Author(s):  
Masayasu Aikawa ◽  
Yosuke Ueno ◽  
Yukihiro Watanabe ◽  
Katsuya Okada ◽  
Hiroshi Sato ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S833
Author(s):  
C. Chong ◽  
W.Y. Chung ◽  
P. Yau ◽  
P. Wong ◽  
H.-t. Lok ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S585
Author(s):  
C. Chong ◽  
W.Y. Chung ◽  
P. Yau ◽  
P. Wong ◽  
H.-t. Lok ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Zhongling Xu ◽  
Zihan Feng ◽  
Yinze Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients often undergo curative liver resection to treat this form of cancer. Hepatectomy is, however, a form of major surgery associated with many significant risks including prolonged hospitalization, high costs, impaired physiological function, and high postoperative complication rates. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary approach that seeks to expedite postoperative recovery in patients undergoing major surgeries in order to lower postoperative complication rates. This study was thus designed to assess the efficacy and safety of individualized ERAS approaches in patients undergoing hepatectomy.  Methods In total, we retrospectively analyzed data from 90 HCC patients that underwent hepatectomy between October 2018 and August 2019. All patients met the study enrollment criteria and provided written informed consent to participate. All studies were approved by the Hospital Research Ethics Committee and were consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 45 each) based on the employed perioperative treatment strategies: a conventional treatment group and an ERAS treatment group. Key outcomes were then compared between groups, including postoperative pain scores, duration of postoperative hospitalization, medical costs, and rates of readmission.  Results ERAS treatment was associated with lower postoperative pain scores at 24, 48, and 72 h post-treatment (P &lt; 0.05), with a shorter postoperative hospitalization duration (8.16 days vs.10.49 days; P &lt; 0.004), and with lower medical costs (P &lt; 0.004) as compared to traditional treatment. No significant differences in complication rates (P &gt; 0.05) or readmission rates (P &gt; 0.557) were observed between these groups.  Conclusions Individualized ERAS improves patient postoperative recovery more effectively than traditional treatment in patients undergoing hepatectomy. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document