scholarly journals Effect of Surgeon and Hospital Factors on Length of Stay after Colorectal Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. S44
Author(s):  
Zubair Bayat ◽  
Erin Kennedy ◽  
Charles Victor ◽  
Anand Govindarajan
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Felipe de Campos Lobato ◽  
Patrícia Cristina Alves Ferreira ◽  
Elizabeth C. Wick ◽  
Ravi P. Kiran ◽  
Feza H. Remzi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
pp. 928-934
Author(s):  
Nathan M. Johnson ◽  
Sandy L. Fogel

Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) have been shown to lead to quicker recovery in colorectal surgery, with reduced postoperative length of stay (LOS). ERPs could potentially be improved with an expanded preoperative component reflecting current evidence. We hypothesize that an ERP with an expanded preoperative component will reduce LOS consistent with or exceeding that seen with traditional ERPs. Our ERP was implemented in June of 2014. Data was collected for two full years from July 2014 through June 2016. The protocol was employed in colorectal cases, both elective and emergent. Data from ERP cases were compared with contemporaneous controls that did not go through the ERP. Patients who underwent colorectal procedures and participated in the ERP with the expanded preoperative component had an average LOS of 5.33 days, whereas controls stayed for an average of 7.93 days (P value, <0.01). ERP cases also experienced fewer read-missions and complications, although statistical significance could not be established. The results demonstrate that an ERP with an enhanced preoperative component significantly reduces LOS and potentially decreases the rate of readmissions and total complications.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Trentino ◽  
Hamish Mace ◽  
Kylie Symons ◽  
Frank M. Sanfilippo ◽  
Michael F. Leahy ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (02) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Bordeianou ◽  
Paul Cavallaro

AbstractEnhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been demonstrated to improve hospital length of stay and outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. This article presents the specific components of an ERAS protocol implemented at the authors' institution. In particular, details of both surgical and anesthetic ERAS pathways are provided with explanation of all aspects of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care. Evidence supporting inclusion of various aspects within the ERAS protocol is briefly reviewed. The ERAS protocol described has significantly benefitted postoperative outcomes in colorectal patients and can be employed at other institutions wishing to develop an ERAS pathway for colorectal patients. A checklist is provided for clinicians to easily reference and facilitate implementation of a standardized protocol.


2010 ◽  
Vol 252 (5) ◽  
pp. 891-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravikrishna Mamidanna ◽  
Alex M. Almoudaris ◽  
Omar Faiz

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 972-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinna C Zygourakis ◽  
Caterina Y Liu ◽  
Seungwon Yoon ◽  
Christopher Moriates ◽  
Christy Boscardin ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND There is a significant increase and large variation in craniotomy costs. However, the causes of cost differences in craniotomies remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To examine the patient and hospital factors that underlie the cost variation in tumor craniotomies using 2 national databases: the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and Vizient, Inc. (Irving, Texas). METHODS For 41 483 patients who underwent primary surgery for supratentorial brain tumors from 2001 to 2013 in the NIS, we created univariate and multivariate models to evaluate the effect of several patient factors and hospital factors on total hospital cost. Similarly, we performed multivariate analysis with 15 087 cases in the Vizient 2012 to 2015 database. RESULTS In the NIS, the mean inflation-adjusted cost per tumor craniotomy increased 30%, from $23 021 in 2001 to $29 971 in 2013. In 2001, the highest cost region was the Northeast ($24 486 ± $1184), and by 2013 the western United States was the highest cost region ($36 058 ± $1684). Multivariate analyses with NIS data showed that male gender, white race, private insurance, higher mortality risk, higher severity of illness, longer length of stay, elective admissions, higher wage index, urban teaching hospitals, and hospitals in the western United States were associated with higher tumor craniotomy costs (all P &lt; .05). Multivariate analyses with Vizient data confirmed that longer length of stay and the western United States were significantly associated with higher costs (P &lt; .001). CONCLUSION After controlling for patient/clinical factors, hospital type, bed size, and wage index, hospitals in the western United States had higher costs than those in other parts of the country, based on analyses from 2 separate national databases.


2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 530-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
ECG Tudor ◽  
W Yang ◽  
R Brown ◽  
PM Mackey

Introduction Rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) are increasingly being used to provide postoperative analgesia following laparotomy for colorectal surgery. Little is known about their efficacy in comparison with epidural infusion analgesia (EIA). They are potentially better as they avoid the recognised complications associated with EIA. This study compares these two methods of analgesia. Outcomes include average pain scores, time to mobilisation and length of stay. Methods This was a 33-month single centre observational study including all patients undergoing elective open or laparoscopic-converted-to-open colorectal resection for both benign and malignant disease. Patients received either EIA or RSCs. Data were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively. Results A total of 95 patients were identified. Indications for surgery, operation and complications were recorded. The mean time to mobilisation was significantly shorter in patients who had RSCs compared with EIA patients (2.4 vs 3.5 days, p<0.05). There was no difference in postoperative pain scores or length of stay. Conclusions RSCs provide equivalent analgesia to EIA and avoid the recognised potential complications of EIA. They are associated with a shorter time to mobilisation. Their use should be adopted more widely.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document