Integration of Life Care Specialists Into Orthopaedic Trauma Care: A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. e133
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Giordano ◽  
Jesse Seilern und Aspang ◽  
Cammie Wolf Rice ◽  
Bailey Barrell ◽  
Lauren Kirk ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 310-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
CPT Andrew Cleveland ◽  
Amr Abdelgawad ◽  
Jonathan Cook ◽  
Miguel Pirela-Cruz

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (10) ◽  
pp. 2305-2309
Author(s):  
MICHAEL T. ARCHDEACON ◽  
PETER J. STERN

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000254
Author(s):  
Takashi Fujita

IntroductionAging is one of the most serious social issues, not only in Japan. A country’s socioeconomic conditions must be taken into account when considering the issue of rapid aging. The purpose of this review was to introduce the historical and socioeconomic background of geriatric trauma care in Japan.MethodLiterature review regarding the trauma care for the elderly written in Japanese and English.Results“PinPinKorori” is a Japanese word which symbolizes an ideal, healthy life. “NenNenkorori” is the opposite of PinPinKorori. The Japanese elderly desire to live a healthy, active life and die (PinPinKorori) rather than being bedridden and dying in agony. A bedridden individual (NenNenKorori) is a candidate for receiving end-of-life care. End-of-life care is a form of trauma care for the elderly that ensures quality of death for those in need.ConclusionsI encourage the elderly to document their advance care preferences with decision-making capacity in order to avoid futile care. Healthcare providers should strive to provide optimum care to the patients in their best interest and ensure not to provide treatment that is not desired by the patients.Level of evidenceLevel IV.


2016 ◽  
Vol 98 (21) ◽  
pp. 1844-1853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran J. Agarwal-Harding ◽  
Arvind von Keudell ◽  
Lewis G. Zirkle ◽  
John G. Meara ◽  
George S.M. Dyer

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
Michael Lee Brennan ◽  
Robert A. Probe

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1S) ◽  
pp. e114
Author(s):  
Luis G. Padilla-Rojas ◽  
Roberto E. López-Cervantes ◽  
Leonardo López-Almejo ◽  
Israel Gutiérrez-Mendoza ◽  
Rafael E. Amadei-Enghelmayer ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 38-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjana Ranganathan ◽  
James J. Sauerbaum ◽  
Katie Green ◽  
Heather Sheaffer ◽  
Mary Coniglio ◽  
...  

38 Background: Advanced care planning can significantly impact the quality of end of life care. Readily accessible documentation of goals of care for patients (pts) known to have a high morbidity and mortality provides a concrete means for practitioners to discuss and guide advanced care planning. We previously reported a surprisingly small proportion of established pts in our oncology clinic with a documented code status (CS), and undertook a pilot project aimed at improving this rate. Methods: Query of the outpatient electronic medical record (EMR) at the Abramson Cancer Center for established pts revealed an average of 2% with a documented CS. Our pilot study focused on 8 providers in thoracic and gastrointestinal oncology. We established provider agreement on the importance of CS documentation, and analyzed the mechanisms in place for documentation. We educated providers on the method of documentation, raised visibility and importance of advanced directives, implemented a system of normalizing conversations for all new pts, reported weekly to providers on upcoming established pts without documentation and provided monthly report cards, indicating provider rates within the pilot group. Results: Prior to intervention, a median of 499-established pts per month were seen by our pilot group. A median of 50 pts (10%) had a documented CS with documentation rates by provider ranging from 0 – 91%. 5 of 8 providers had no established pts with a documented CS. After intervention, a median of 494-established pts per month were seen by the same group. A median of 197 pts (40%) (p < 0.05) had a documented CS with provider rates ranging from 26 – 94%. All providers had documented a CS on at least some of their established pts; improvements ranged from an increase of 0 to 26%, to an increase of 1 to 43%. Conclusions: Previously, at our institution, only a small minority of established patients with an oncologic diagnosis had documentation of CS in the readily available EMR. Our pilot study resulted in a statistically significant increase in the documentation rates for all providers over a 2-month period. We have yet to analyze the clinical significance of this, with attention to quality and cost of end of life care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document