A Comprehensive Review of the Quality and Feasibility of Dementia Assessment Measures: The Dementia Outcomes Measurement Suite

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 826-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Bentvelzen ◽  
Liesbeth Aerts ◽  
Katrin Seeher ◽  
Jacqueline Wesson ◽  
Henry Brodaty
Keyword(s):  
Comprehensive Review ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Measurement Suite ◽  
Assessment Measures

The Dementia Outcomes Measurement Suite (DOMS) Project

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e7-e8
Author(s):  
J. Sansoni ◽  
N. Marosszeky ◽  
E. Sansoni
Keyword(s):  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Measurement Suite

O1-07-03: Some highlights of the Australian Dementia Outcomes Measurement Suite (DOMS) project: Social isolation

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (4S_Part_3) ◽  
pp. P90-P90
Author(s):  
Jan Sansoni ◽  
Nick Marosszeky ◽  
Graeme Hawthorne ◽  
Emily Sansoni
Keyword(s):  
Social Isolation ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Measurement Suite

Outcomes Measurement and Management: Culturally Diverse Views of Impairment, Disability, and Handicap

1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Carol Frattali ◽  
Hortencia Kayser
Keyword(s):  
Culturally Diverse ◽  
Outcomes Measurement

Outcomes Measurement and Management: Collection of Data in University Clinics: A National Survey

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 13-15
Author(s):  
Karen Bailey-Jones ◽  
Rosemary B. Lubinski ◽  
D. Jeffery Higginbotham
Keyword(s):  
National Survey ◽  
Outcomes Measurement

Outcomes Measurement and Management

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 12-14
Author(s):  
Rose L. Allen ◽  
Michael Rastatter
Keyword(s):  
Outcomes Measurement

Outcomes Measurement in Higher Education: Graduate Program Admission Issues

1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Linda Cleeland ◽  
Ellen Meyer Gregg
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Graduate Program ◽  
Outcomes Measurement

What Have We Learned From Physiological Approaches to Characterizing Dysarthria and Other Speech Production Disorders?

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-46
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Etter
Keyword(s):  
Speech Production ◽  
Speech Disorders ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Systematic Research ◽  
Physiological Measures ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Assessment Measures ◽  
Perceptual Assessment ◽  
Perceptual Characteristics ◽  
Diagnostic Resolution

Traditionally, speech-language pathologists (SLP) have been trained to develop interventions based on a select number of perceptual characteristics of speech without or through minimal use of objective instrumental and physiologic assessment measures of the underlying articulatory subsystems. While indirect physiological assumptions can be made from perceptual assessment measures, the validity and reliability of those assumptions are tenuous at best. Considering that neurological damage will result in various degrees of aberrant speech physiology, the need for physiologic assessments appears highly warranted. In this context, do existing physiological measures found in the research literature have sufficient diagnostic resolution to provide distinct and differential data within and between etiological classifications of speech disorders and versus healthy controls? The goals of this paper are (a) to describe various physiological and movement-related techniques available to objectively study various dysarthrias and speech production disorders and (b) to develop an appreciation for the need for increased systematic research to better define physiologic features of dysarthria and speech production disorders and their relation to know perceptual characteristics.

Comprehensive Review of Psychooncology

1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-529
Author(s):  
Mary Catherine King
Keyword(s):  
Comprehensive Review
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document