Outcomes Measurement in Higher Education: Outcomes Measurement in a University Setting

1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-8
Author(s):  
Judith A. Rassi
2018 ◽  
Vol 186 ◽  
pp. 364-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mervi Friman ◽  
Dusan Schreiber ◽  
Rilla Syrjänen ◽  
Emma Kokkonen ◽  
Arto Mutanen ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 546-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie Gratch Lindauer

Accreditation agencies, higher education institutions, and professional organizations all emphasize the importance of measuring and assessing the impacts or effects of teaching, learning, and other valued institutional activities. Academic libraries, one of the key players in providing and structuring instructional resources and services, also are expected to document how their performance contributes to institutional goals and outcomes. Using accreditation and ACRL sectional standards/criteria, higher education outcomes assessment research findings and recent findings from performance effectiveness studies, this article identifies important institutional outcomes to which academic libraries contribute; describes specific performance indicators whose measures of impacts and outputs provide evidence about progress and achievement; and offers a conceptual framework of assessment domains for the teaching–learning library.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-575
Author(s):  
Fei Guo ◽  
Yan Luo ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
Jinghuan Shi ◽  
Hamish Coates

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vlad Pașca

Abstract: This article sets to analyze the manpower planning approach in respect of the Romanian higher education system during communism. The arguments used intend to demonstrate that long-term planning, although commonly used in the context of demand economy, was not a reliable instrument in education. Archival research has outlined the connections and the variations between long-term ‘cadre’ plans and higher education outcomes, in an attempt to better assess the feasibility of manpower planning in a socialist economy. The empirical analysis confirms the theoretical approach used by Jan Sadlak in the 1980s, but also provides an additional outlook on the practical and conceptual limitations of centralized normative planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document