A Quality Improvement System to Manage Feeding Assistance Care in Assisted-Living

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra F. Simmons ◽  
Chris S. Coelho ◽  
Andrew Sandler ◽  
John F. Schnelle



2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S582-S582
Author(s):  
Lauren Harris-Kojetin

Abstract Voluntary surveys of aging services providers are important data sources for research, quality improvement, and program evaluation efforts to inform evidence-based decision making. Ideally, provider surveys—a type of establishment survey—offer valuable information on providers and services users. However, decreasing survey response rates in recent years raise data quality concerns. This symposium highlights challenges leading to lower response rates (e.g., time constraints, skepticism, confidentiality concerns, getting to the correct respondent); specific data collection techniques tested, what did and did not work, and lessons learned. Although the surveys focus on long-term services and supports (LTSS) providers (e.g., assisted living) and services users (e.g., residents), the session is generalizable to other establishment surveys. Presenters bring extensive survey experience and diverse organizational perspectives—academic research center, national provider association, federal statistical agency, and research contractor. Over the years, the presenters have used their research network to share challenges and lessons learned with each other, which addresses the GSA conference theme, “Strength in Age: Harnessing the Power of Networks.” The first presentation describes test results of a state survey protocol to obtain sampled resident information from assisted living providers. The second presentation examines approaches to increase provider participation in a quality improvement initiative. The third presentation discusses efforts to address response challenges in an on-going national survey of providers in two LTSS sectors. The session allows time for and facilitates interaction with audience members to share their insights and lessons learned.



2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
Angela Greene ◽  
Philip D. Sloane ◽  
Madeline Mitchell ◽  
Carol Giuliani ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 133-133
Author(s):  
D White ◽  
J Cartwright ◽  
A Marcus ◽  
M Burt


Author(s):  
Edmond Ramly ◽  
Reid Parks ◽  
Theresa Fishler ◽  
James H. Ford ◽  
David Zimmerman ◽  
...  


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 720-720
Author(s):  
S. Zimmerman ◽  
L. Cohen ◽  
T. Washington ◽  
K. Ward ◽  
P. Giorgio


Healthcare ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Singh ◽  
Wiese ◽  
Sillerud

This qualitative research project aimed to gain an understanding of the experiences of managers who participated in the implementation of quality improvement projects in an assisted living facility. This study employed hermeneutic phenomenology as a research methodology, whereby managers working in an assisted living facility were invited to participate in a 60–75 min semi-structured interview. Six managers participated in the interviews. Five themes were developed from data analysis: (1) Quality improvement (QI) and resident-centered care go hand-in-hand; (2) Constant on-going commitment to continuous improvement is needed to implement QI; (3) Learning to communicate with team-members and residents/caregivers is important to implement QI; (4) Feedback is essential for the implementation of QI initiatives; and (5) Implementing new QI initiatives can be challenging. The managers emphasized the need for leadership commitment, the usage of standardized communication methods, and feedback strategies to ensure the success of QI initiatives. Additionally, the managers indicated that QI is directly related to resident-centered care and that efforts should be made to collect feedback from residents to further improve processes. Additionally, challenges surrounding the implementation of QI have been described. Since there is a scarcity of research on the implementation of QI methods in assisted living facilities, this study can provide practical tips to leaders and administrators.



2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (S3) ◽  
pp. S62-S68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip D. Sloane ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
David Reed ◽  
Anna Song Beeber ◽  
Latarsha Chisholm ◽  
...  

Objective.To describe the prevalence, characteristics, and appropriateness of systemic antibiotic use in assisted living (AL) and to conduct a preliminary quality improvement intervention trial to reduce inappropriate prescribing.Design.Pre-post study, with a 13-month intervention period.Setting.Four AL communities.Participants.All prescribers, all AL staff who communicate with prescribers, and all patients who had an infection during the baseline and intervention periods.Intervention.A standardized form for AL staff, an online education course and 5 practice briefs for prescribers, and monthly quality improvement meetings with AL staff.Measurements.Monthly inventory of all systemic antibiotic prescriptions; interviews with the prescriber, AL staff member, closest family member, and patient (when capable) regarding 85 antibiotic prescribing episodes (30 baseline, 55 intervention), with data review by an expert panel to determine prescribing appropriateness.Results.The mean number of systemic antibiotic prescriptions was 3.44 per 1,000 resident-days at baseline and 3.37 during the intervention, a nonsignificant change (P = .30). Few prescribers participated in online training. AL staff use of the standardized form gradually increased during the program. The proportion of prescriptions rated as probably inappropriate was 26% at baseline and 15% during the intervention, a nonsignificant trend (P = .25). Drug selection was largely appropriate during both time periods.Conclusions.AL antibiotic prescribing rates appear to be approximately one-half those seen in nursing homes, with up to a quarter being potentially inappropriate. Interventions to improve prescribing must reach all physicians and staff and most likely will require long time periods to have the optimal effect.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document