scholarly journals A Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form for Measuring Physical Function During Geriatric Rehabilitation: Test-Retest Reliability, Construct Validity, Responsiveness, and Interpretability

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewout B. Smit ◽  
Hylco Bouwstra ◽  
Leo D. Roorda ◽  
Johannes (Hans) C. van der Wouden ◽  
Elizabeth (Lizette) M. Wattel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Geriatric Rehabilitation ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals Chinese Version of Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form Measures

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 430-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanyan Liu ◽  
Changrong Yuan ◽  
Jichuan Wang ◽  
Nanping Shen ◽  
Min Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Pediatric Patient ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Chinese Version ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System

scholarly journals Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue-Short Form Across Diverse Populations

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Ameringer ◽  
R. K. Elswick ◽  
Victoria Menzies ◽  
Jo Lynne Robins ◽  
Angela Starkweather ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Diverse Populations ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of patient reported outcomes measurement information system computerized adaptive tests in systemic lupus erythematous

Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110512
Author(s):  
Mitra Moazzami ◽  
Patricia Katz ◽  
Dennisse Bonilla ◽  
Lisa Engel ◽  
Jiandong Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematous ◽  
Strong Correlations ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background The evaluation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive test (CAT) in adults with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) is an emerging field of research. We aimed to examine the test–retest reliability and construct validity of the PROMIS CAT in a Canadian cohort of patients with SLE. Methods Two hundred twenty-seven patients completed 14 domains of PROMIS CAT and seven legacy instruments during their clinical visits. Test–retest reliability of PROMIS was evaluated 7–10 days from baseline using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (2; 1)). The construct validity of the PROMIS CAT domains was evaluated against the commonly used legacy instruments, and also in comparison to disease activity and disease damage using Spearman correlations. A multitrait-multimethod matrix (MMM) approach was used to further assess construct validity comparing selected 10 domains of PROMIS and SF-36 domains. Results Moderate to excellent reliability was found for all domains (ICC [2;1] ranging from lowest, 0.66 for Sleep Disturbance and highest, 0.93 for the Mobility domain). Comparing seven legacy instruments with 14 domains of PROMIS CAT, moderate to strong correlations (0.51–0.91) were identified. The average time to complete all PROMIS CAT domains was 11.7 min. The MMM further established construct validity by showing moderate to strong correlations (0.55–0.87) between select PROMIS and SF-36 domains; the average correlations from similar traits (convergent validity) were significantly greater than the average correlations from different traits. Conclusions These results provide evidence on the reliability and validity of PROMIS CAT in SLE in a Canadian cohort.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Hadlandsmyth ◽  
Lilian N. Dindo ◽  
Barbara J. St. Marie ◽  
Roohina Wajid ◽  
Jennie L. Embree ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Orthopedic Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System ◽  
Item Scale

The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s αs ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures ( r = .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another ( r = .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document