Meta-analysis Comparing Inappropriately Low Dose versus Standard Dose of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Kido ◽  
Mikiko Shimizu ◽  
Tsuyoshi Shiga ◽  
Masayuki Hashiguchi
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Doni ◽  
Stefanie Bühn ◽  
Alina Weise ◽  
Nina-Kristin Mann ◽  
Simone Hess ◽  
...  

Abstract PurposeOur objective was to assess the safety of long-term intake of DOACs in older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). MethodsWe included RCTs in elderly (≥65 years) patients with AF. A systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed on 9/11/2020. For determination of risk of bias, the RoB-2 tool was applied. We pooled outcomes using random-effects meta-analyses. The quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE.ResultsTen RCTs with a total of 61,948 patients were identified. Seven RCTs included patients with AF-only and three with AF who received PCI and additional antiplatelet-therapy. Two RCTs compared apixaban with either warfarin or aspirin, three edoxaban with either placebo, aspirin, or Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), two dabigatran with warfarin and three rivaroxaban with warfarin. DOACs probably reduce mortality in elderly patients with AF-only (HR 0.89 95%CI 0.78 to 1.02). We did not find any RCT that reported mortality in elderly AF-PCI patients. Low-dose DOACs likely reduce bleeding compared to VKAs (HR ranged from 0.47 to 1.01). High-dose edoxaban reduces major or clinically relevant bleeding (MCRB) compared to VKAs (HR 0.82 95%CI 0.73 to 0.93) but high-dose dabigatran or rivaroxaban increase MCRB (HR 1.15 95%CI 1.02 to 1.30).Conclusion We found that low-dose DOACs probably decrease mortality in AF-only patients. Moreover, apixaban and edoxaban are associated with fewer MCRB compared to VKAs. For dabigatran and rivaroxaban, the risk of MCRB varies depending on dose.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Hage ◽  
Daniel Dolan ◽  
Viviane G Nasr ◽  
Luis Castelo-Branco ◽  
Daniel Motta-Calderon ◽  
...  

Introduction: The evidence for use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the management of post-operative cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation (POAF) is limited and mostly founded on clinical trials that excluded this patient population. Hypothesis: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials and observational studies to evaluate the hypothesis that DOACs are safe compared to warfarin for the anticoagulation of patients with POAF. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library for clinical trials and observational studies comparing DOAC with warfarin in patients ≥18 years old who had post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation. Primary outcomes included stroke, systemic embolization, bleeding, and mortality, with secondary outcome of hospital readmission. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: We found 3 clinical trials, 1 prospective and 12 retrospective cohort studies eligible for inclusion with a total of 10,538 patients (3,207 DOAC patients and 7,331 warfarin patients). The meta-analysis for the primary outcomes showed significantly lower risk of stroke with DOAC use (6 studies, 7143 patients, RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.81, I2: 0.0%) compared to warfarin, a trend towards lower risk of systemic embolization (4 studies, 7289 patients, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.01, I2: 31.99%) and similar risks of bleeding (14 studies, 10182 patients, RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.10, I2: 26.6%) and mortality (12 studies, 9843 patients, relative risk [RR] 1.01; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.37, I2: 26.5%) The secondary outcome of hospital readmission had similar risk between groups. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that DOACs, compared to warfarin, in the management of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery is associated with lower risk of stroke and a strong trend for lower risk of systemic embolization, and no evidence of increased risk for hospital readmission, bleeding or mortality.


Author(s):  
Marco Valerio Mariani ◽  
Michele Magnocavallo ◽  
Martina Straito ◽  
Agostino Piro ◽  
Paolo Severino ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as first-line anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in patients with cancer and AF the efficacy and safety of DOACs are not well established. Objective We performed a meta-analysis comparing available data regarding the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in cancer patients with non-valvular AF. Methods An online search of Pubmed and EMBASE libraries (from inception to May, 1 2020) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Nine studies were considered eligible for the meta-analysis involving 46,424 DOACs users and 182,797 VKA users. Results The use of DOACs was associated with reduced risks of systemic embolism or any stroke (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.52–0.81; p 0.001), ischemic stroke (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95; p 0.007) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.52–0.71; p 0.00001) as compared to VKA group. DOAC use was associated with significantly reduced risks of major bleeding (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50–0.92; p 0.01) and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.47–0.88; p 0.006). Compared to VKA, DOACs provided a non-statistically significant risk reduction of the outcomes major bleeding or non-major clinically relevant bleeding (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.78–1.13; p 0.50) and any bleeding (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.78–1.06; p 0.24). Conclusions In comparison to VKA, DOACs were associated with a significant reduction of the rates of thromboembolic events and major bleeding complications in patients with AF and cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 1034-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Violi ◽  
Annarita Vestri ◽  
Danilo Menichelli ◽  
Arianna Di Rocco ◽  
Daniele Pastori ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document