Cost-Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Therapies for Cardiovascular Prevention in Germany

Purpose Novel pharmaceutical treatments reducing cardiovascular events in dyslipidaemia patients must demonstrate clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness to promote long-term adoption by patients, physicians, and insurers. Objective To assess the cost-effectiveness of statin monotherapy compared to additive lipid-lowering therapies for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention from the perspective of Germany’s healthcare system. Methods Transition probabilities and hazard ratios were derived from cardiovascular outcome trials for statin combinations with icosapent ethyl (REDUCE-IT), evolocumab (FOURIER), alirocumab (ODYSSEY), ezetimibe (IMPROVE-IT), and fibrate (ACCORD). Costs and utilities were retrieved from previous literature. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was simulated with a Markov cohort model. The main outcomes were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Results For primary prevention, the addition of icosapent ethyl to statin generated 0.81 QALY and €14,732 costs (ICER: 18,133), whereas fibrates yielded 0.63 QALY and € − 10,516 costs (ICER: − 16,632). For secondary prevention, the addition of ezetimibe to statin provided 0.61 QALY at savings of € − 5,796 (ICER: − 9,555) and icosapent ethyl yielded 0.99 QALY and €14,333 costs (ICER: 14,485). PCSK9 inhibitors offered 0.55 and 0.87 QALY at costs of €62,722 and €87,002 for evolocumab (ICER: 114,639) and alirocumab (ICER: 100,532), respectively. A 95% probability of cost-effectiveness was surpassed at €20,000 for icosapent ethyl (primary and secondary prevention), €119,000 for alirocumab, and €149,000 for evolocumab. Conclusions For primary cardiovascular prevention, a combination therapy of icosapent ethyl plus statin is a cost-effective use of resources compared to statin monotherapy. For secondary prevention, icosapent ethyl, ezetimibe, evolocumab, and alirocumab increase patient benefit at different economic costs.

The Selective NLRP3-inflammasome inhibitor MCC950 Mitigates Post-resuscitation Myocardial Dysfunction and Improves Survival in a Rat Model of Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

Purpose To investigate the effects of the selective NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor MCC950 on post-resuscitation myocardial function and survival in a rat model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods Thirty-six Sprague Dawley rats were randomized into three groups: (1) MCC950, (2) control, and (3) sham. Each group consisted of a 6 h non-survival subgroup (n = 6) and a 48 h survival subgroup (n = 6). Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced and untreated for 6 min. CPR was initiated and continued for 8 min. Resuscitation was attempted with a 4 J defibrillation. MCC950 (10 mg/kg) or vehicle was administered via intraperitoneal injection immediately after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Myocardial function and sublingual microcirculation were measured after ROSC in the non-survival subgroups. Plasma levels of interleukin Iβ (IL-1β) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) were measured at baseline and 6 h in the non-survival subgroups. Heart tissue was harvested to measure the NLRP3 inflammasome constituents, including NLRP3, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein (ASC), Caspase-1, and IL-1β. Survival duration and neurologic deficit score (NDS) were recorded and evaluated among survival groups. Results Post-resuscitation myocardial function and sublingual microcirculation were improved in MCC950 compared with control (p < 0.05). IL-1β and cTnI were decreased in MCC950 compared to control (p < 0.01). The MCC950 treated groups showed significantly reduced ASC, caspase-1, and IL-1β compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Survival at 48 h after ROSC was greater in MCC950 (p < 0.05) with improved NDS (p < 0.05). Conclusion Administration of MCC950 following ROSC mitigates post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction and improves survival.