scholarly journals Short-selling, margin-trading, and price efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese market

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 411-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric C. Chang ◽  
Yan Luo ◽  
Jinjuan Ren
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 1557-1604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiong Xiong ◽  
Ya Gao ◽  
Xu Feng

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee-Young Cheng ◽  
Zhipeng Yan ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
Wei-Fang Chang

Author(s):  
Peter N Dixon

Abstract When short selling is costly, owners of an asset have greater incentive to become informed than nonowners because trading on negative information is easier for them. Thus, information acquisition concentrates among investors owning the asset. A short selling ban restricts selling to only the relatively more informed investors who own the asset, increasing adverse selection but only on the sell side of the market. Price efficiency declines due to less overall information acquisition because a ban magnifies the disincentive to gather information for investors not owning the asset. Empirical evidence from the 2008 U.S. short selling ban is consistent with these theoretical predictions. (JEL G10, G14, G18)


2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1833-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Thornock

ABSTRACT: This study examines the effects of dividend taxation on the primary parties involved in a short sale: the lender of the stock and the short seller. For stock lenders, dividend taxation is associated with a decrease in the supply of shortable shares and an increase in equity lending fees around the dividend record date. For short sellers, potential reimbursement costs are associated with a significant decrease in short volume before the ex-dividend date followed by a significant increase after the ex-date. Prior research shows that short selling improves price efficiency and formation. Hence, because of the negative effects of taxation on shorting, market quality declines along several dimensions: equity mispricing, increased loan search frictions, loan price inefficiencies, and market microstructure breakdown. In sum, this study documents that taxation constricts the shorting market around the dividend dates, which in turn has negative implications for market quality. JEL Classifications: G11, G12, G23, H20


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Li ◽  
Jiahui Li ◽  
Jinjian Yuan

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically analyze the impacts of short prohibitions on stock prices. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt event study in this paper. First, the authors match each shortable stocks with one unshortable stocks by the propensity score matching method. Second, the authors check the performance difference between treatment group and control group after the event date. Third, the authors check the performance difference among sub-groups sorted by other factors associated with stock returns. Findings The authors find that stocks do not decline necessarily after removal of short prohibitions; only those heavily overpriced stocks, such as small stocks, lower B/M or P/E stocks and higher turnover stocks, decline significantly. Research limitations/implications The media falsely stated that short selling lead to market crash; otherwise, short selling is beneficial for improving market efficiency as it is helpful for keeping overpriced stocks in line with the fundamental value. Originality/value This is the first paper showing that removal of short prohibitions only impacts heavily overpriced stocks significantly, which is valuable for policy making.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (15) ◽  
pp. 1350-1368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhisheng Li ◽  
Bingxuan Lin ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Chen Chen

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Pengfei Liu

<p><b>This thesis consists of five chapters. Chapter 1 is the preliminaries. Chapter 2 to chapter 4 are the three main chapters of this thesis, which covers the U.S. market, international market, and the Chinese market, respectively. Chapter 5 is the discussion.</b></p> <p>Chapter 1 is the preliminaries. It introduces the setting and motivations for the three topics covered in this thesis.</p> <p>Chapter 2 investigates how equity exchange-traded fund (ETF) ownership affects the cost of debt. I find that, by facilitating short-selling activities to execute disciplinary effects, equity ETF ownership decreases a firm's cost of debt. This negative association between equity ETF ownership and the cost of debt is more pronounced for firms with weaker information environments and lower bond ratings. The disciplinary effect works through a more active short-selling market provided by equity ETF ownership. However, I fail to establish the corporate governance channel, which is consistent with Schmidt and Fahlenbrach (2017) and Heath, Macciocchi, Michaely, and Ringgenberg (2021).. Those results are also robust to endogeneity.</p> <p>Chapter 3 studies the predictive power of the trend strategy in the international stock market. Using data from 49 markets, I find that a trend signal exploiting the short-,intermediate-, and long-term price information can predict stock returns cross-sectionally in the international market. The significance of the trend strategy is associated with market-level characteristics such as macroeconomic conditions, culture, and the information environment. The trend premium is more pronounced in markets with a more advanced macroeconomic status, a higher level of information uncertainty and individualism, and better accessibility to foreign investors. Nevertheless, the trend strategy only outperforms the momentum strategy in a relatively short horizon.</p> <p>Chapter 4 investigates whether margin-trading in the Chinese stock market reflects information or sentiment. At the aggregate level, I find no evidence of information-driven or sentiment-driven margin-trading behavior. At the individual stock level, both information-driven and sentiment-driven margin-trading exists, which are relevant to firm characteristics. I also find the likelihood of sentiment-driven margin-trading significantly declined after the regulator enforced tighter rules for margin-trading in 2015.</p> <p>Chapter 5 summarizes the main findings of the three topics, discusses the implications of the findings, and points out the future direction for research.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document